Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
JAYSON✨Follow78.6%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 14Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
2
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
Ayomide ilesanmiFollow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
bensalemFollow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Queen_SikabaFollow72.7%Win Rate +23.8%ROI 11Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
Kei R🐉Won 9/11Follow70.6%Win Rate +22.2%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Loyal08 Won 4/6Chicago Fire is in great form. They've been performing well recently, though they're just a mid - table team and the gap between them and their opponents isn't huge. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has a poor goal - scoring ability and isn't in top form. However, they have a good home record with few losses. This doesn't align with both teams' recent offensive and defensive performances and historical head - to - head data. In terms of the historical records, the home - field team has an edge. In this game, Chicago Fire has the home - field advantage against Portland Timbers, which has a good trend in head - to - head data. It remains to be seen which team will be able to showcase its true strength in this match. The Portland Timbers' recent form has been quite impressive. The key to their significant improvement lies in the outstanding performance of their defense. Meanwhile, the Chicago Fire has also been playing steadily in recent games, with a decent overall performance and solAH
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Iqbal ahmadBoth Chicago Fire and Portland Timbers are struggling with inefficiency in their offensive play. Chicago Fire has a conversion rate of 12.3% in offensive finishes, which is below the league average. Meanwhile, Portland Timbers only manages an xG efficiency of 0.62 per 90 minutes. The key pass success rates of both teams fail to reach 45%, and the value of forward passes is less than 1.8 times per 90 minutes, indicating a lack of creative organization. In midfield control, Chicago Fire holds an average ball possession rate of 58%, but their transition speed is only 1.2 times per minute, contrasting sharply with Portland Timbers' rapid transition rate of 1.4 times per minute. Chicago Fire covers a running distance of 118 km and has 12 high - intensity sprints, yet their defensive performance is far from satisfactory. Their tackle success rate is only 22%, interception efficiency is 0.8 times per 90 minutes, and the clearance error rate is as high as 35%. Both teams are wasting scoring opO/UMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Kei R🐉 Won 9/11The Chicago Fire is in great form, winning multiple games recently. They're highly motivated in the playoff - spot race. At home, their offense is consistent. The midfield has good ball - control and can effectively organize attacks. The wingers' runs create numerous goal - scoring opportunities. However, the defense is troubled by injuries. Some key defenders are unavailable, and the reshuffled backline is less stable. They'll face pressure when dealing with opponents' quick counter - attacks. The Portland Timbers are on the verge of the Western Conference playoffs, so they're desperate for points. Their attack is fairly potent, mainly relying on wingers' darts and counter - attacks to score. But their away - game performance is inconsistent. There are many defensive flaws on the road, and issues often arise in coordinated defending and covering. Overall, their ability to pick up points away from home is mediocre.AHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post