Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
JAYSON✨Follow78.6%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 14Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
2
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
Ayomide ilesanmiFollow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
bensalemFollow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Queen_SikabaFollow72.7%Win Rate +23.8%ROI 11Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
Kei R🐉Won 9/11Follow70.6%Win Rate +22.2%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
The Chelsea VerdictThe Chicago Fire shows a better offensive performance compared to the Portland Timbers. The Fire's offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, superior to the Timbers' 9.8%. The xG efficiency of the Fire reaches 1.82, while the Timbers only achieve 1.21. In terms of the success rate of key forward passes, the Fire leads with 67%, compared to the Timbers' 58%. The value of forward passes for the Fire is 14.2, more threatening than the Timbers' 9.6. Regarding midfield control data, the Fire averages 11.2 tackles and 8.4 interceptions per game, 20% more than the Timbers. The Fire also outperforms in terms of running distance and high - intensity sprints. They cover 112.3 km in a whole game and have 47 high - intensity sprints, higher than the Timbers' 108.1 km and 39 sprints. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. In the defensive data comparison, Chicago Fire has 11.2 tackles per game and 8.4 interceptions, a 20% improvement over Portland Timbers. Their hO/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Janan💚In this Major League Soccer encounter, Chicago Fire shows a clear edge over Portland Timbers in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Chicago Fire's conversion rate of 12.3% is superior to Portland Timbers' 9.8%. The expected goals (xG) efficiency for Chicago Fire stands at 1.82, while Portland Timbers only manages 1.21. When it comes to key passing success in the attacking third, Chicago Fire leads with a 67% success rate, compared to Portland Timbers' 58%. The value of their attacking passes is also more threatening, with Chicago Fire recording 14.2 against Portland Timbers' 9.6. In midfield control, Chicago Fire has a significant advantage. They average 11.2 tackles and 8.4 interceptions per game, which is 20% more than Portland Timbers. Regarding running statistics, Chicago Fire covers 112.3 km throughout the game and has 47 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than Portland Timbers' 108.1 km and 39 sprints respectively. Based on these data, Chicago FireAHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
きら🐯⚾️🦁Chicago Fire has shown a significant advantage in corner kick statistics during their recent home games, which has become a highlight of their tactical approach. In a Major League Soccer match against Charlotte FC, they secured a 2-1 victory with an 8-6 lead in corner kicks, indicating efficient offensive organization. Earlier, they thrashed CF Montreal 2-0 with a remarkable 16-3 corner kick ratio, showcasing their rapid transition ability in counter - attacks. In the CONCACAF Champions League, they had dominant wins. They defeated Santos Laguna 7-2 and Necaxa 6-3 at home, maintaining a strong performance in corner kicks. Although they lost 1-3 to New York City away from home with a 1-2 corner kick disadvantage, their home average of 7.2 corner kicks per game reflects a well - balanced attack and defense rhythm. Even in games where the corner kick numbers were close, like the 2-1 win over Toronto FC at home and the 1-3 loss to D.C. United away, their ball control and counter - attack eAHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
More Recommend
-
Santa Fe has been in good form lately, winning 6, drawing 3, and losing 1 in their last 10 matches. However, their current state is slightly inferior to the opponent. River Plate, on the other hand, has a record of 2 wins, 2 draws, and 6 losses in the last 10 games, showing a certain gap compared to Santa Fe. Although both teams have goal - scoring capabilities, they are not highly regarded in the data. River Plate's forwards are relatively weak, which poses a certain risk. In comparison, Santa Fe's recent form is better. Given the high difficulty of winning the championship in this event, River Plate may divert some attention to the next game. Santa Fe has shown excellent performance in this game. Their fighting spirit is beyond doubt, and they have an obvious advantage in physical fitness. In contrast, River Plate's form is mediocre, with a certain gap from Santa Fe. In this confrontation, Santa Fe, full of fighting spirit, has an overall strength far exceeding that of River Plate. IAH
CON CSA
Independiente Santa Fe
-
River Plate
CON CSA
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post