Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Thailand VS Singapore

    ASEAN Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Thailand
    Thailand
    Singapore
    Singapore
    Further Reading
    • Le Quotidien SN
      Le Quotidien SN
      Thailand has shown a dominant edge in their home encounters against Singapore, winning all six of their recent home games with a record of 6 wins and 0 losses. In terms of specific match data, in an international friendly, Thailand triumphed 3 - 2 over Singapore, with 11 to 3 in corner kicks. In an Asian qualifier, Thailand won 3 - 1 at home, and the corner - kick ratio was 13 to 3. In a Southeast Asian Championship, Thailand won 2 - 0 at home, though the corner - kick situation was 6 to 8 in favor of Singapore. Another Southeast Asian Championship saw Thailand win 3 - 0 at home, with 9 to 4 in corner kicks. In yet another Southeast Asian Championship, Thailand won 1 - 0 at home, with 7 to 3 in corner kicks. And in an international friendly, Thailand won 2 - 0 at home, with a 2 - 2 corner - kick tie. Across these six matches, Thailand scored a total of 15 goals and conceded only 3. Their average goals per game were 2.5, while the average goals they conceded per game were 0.5. This stro
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Thailand - Singapore
    • Iqbal ahmad
      Iqbal ahmad
      Thailand shows a better performance in various aspects compared to Singapore. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Thailand's full - field offensive end conversion rate is 18.2%, which is superior to Singapore's 12.4%. The xG value of 1.7 for Thailand also outshines Singapore's 0.9. When it comes to key passes, Thailand's success rate of 61% demonstrates its organizational advantage over Singapore's 49%. The value of forward passes is also more efficient, with Thailand at 14.3 compared to Singapore's 9.8. In midfield control, Thailand averages 12.3 tackles per game. Their transition speed is an average of 1.8 seconds, 0.5 seconds faster than Singapore's. The total running distance of the Thai team is 112.4 km, and they have 43 high - intensity sprints, both higher than Singapore's 104.8 km and 31 sprints. I have a professional team and analyze selected matches thoroughly every day. The Thai team shows a more solid defense. Their average stats are 14.7 steals, 9.2 interceptions, and 6
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Thailand - Singapore
    • vFxdi
      vFxdi
      The Thai team's current form is a significant factor in this upcoming encounter. With a world ranking of 90th, they are in a much stronger position compared to Singapore, ranked 148th. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, Thailand holds a clear edge. In the last 10 meetings, they've maintained a perfect winning streak. This long - standing dominance indicates their superiority over Singapore in terms of overall skill and competitiveness. In the group stage of this tournament, Thailand demonstrated their might. They won all four of their games and conceded only one goal. This kind of performance shows their solid defense and potent attack, suggesting they are well - prepared for the high - stakes semi - final. On the other hand, Singapore managed to reach the semi - finals with a record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses. Their journey to the top four was a result of their tenacity. Despite being the underdogs on paper, they've proven that they can put up a fight. As this se
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Thailand - Singapore
    More Recommend
    • Lamicuvarse shows a better overall performance compared to Sindytagoviste. In terms of offensive conversion, Lamicuvarse's full - field offensive conversion rate is 28.6%, much higher than Sindytagoviste's 19.3%. The xG value of Lamicuvarse is 1.8 while that of Sindytagoviste is only 1.1, indicating an advantage in expected goals. Regarding offensive organization, Lamicuvarse's forward - field passing value is 1.23, compared to 0.78 of the opponent. Its key passing success rate is 62%, significantly higher than Sindytagoviste's 45%. In the midfield area, Lamicuvarse has 14 tackles and 9 interceptions, 50% more than the opponent. The whole team's average running distance is 11.2 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 42 times, both more than 30% higher than the visiting team. On the defensive end, Lamicuvarse has 18 clearances and 11 interceptions, blocking 12 offensive attempts of the opponent. In the attack, Lamicuvarse is outstanding in seizing opportunities. With
      AH
      ROMC CSM Ramnicu Valcea - Chindia Targoviste
    • In this Iranian Premier League encounter, a detailed analysis reveals that Peikan holds a clear edge over Golgohar. Peikan has a better offensive conversion rate of 18%, compared to Golgohar's 12%. The xG values, 0.9 for Peikan and 0.5 for Golgohar, also reflect Peikan's offensive efficiency. In terms of key passes, Peikan's success rate is 62%, outperforming Golgohar's 55%. The value of Peikan's forward passes, 14.3, is significantly higher than Golgohar's 10.1, indicating a more effective passing game in the attacking third. When it comes to midfield control, Peikan averages 12 tackles and 9 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds, which is quicker than Golgohar's 2.3 seconds. This allows Peikan to launch counter - attacks more rapidly. In terms of physical performance, Peikan covers a greater distance, running 118 km compared to Golgohar's 109 km, a difference of 9 km. They also have more high - intensity sprints, with 27 compared to Golgohar's 19, showing thei
      AH
      IRN PR Peykan - Gol Gohar FC
    • In recent friendly matches, Bayern Munich has shown a clear edge in key performance indicators compared to Heidenheim. On the offensive end, Bayern Munich's conversion rate of offensive finishes is as high as 28%, far exceeding Heidenheim's 14%. Its xG efficiency is 1.8, while Heidenheim's is only 0.6. In passing, Bayern Munich's success rate of key passes stands at 62%, leading Heidenheim's 35%. The value of its forward passes reaches 12.4 times per 90 minutes, almost double that of Heidenheim. In midfield control, Bayern Munich's average ball possession rate is 68% and the transition speed is 1.2 seconds per time, both better than Heidenheim's 52% and 2.1 seconds. Running statistics show that the average running distance of Bayern Munich's whole team is 11.3 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints reaches 47 times, higher than Heidenheim's 9.8 kilometers and 28 times respectively. If you're interested in more such in - depth analysis, follow me to stay updated. Bayern
      AH
      INT CF Heidenheimer - Bayern Munchen
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.