Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
xuxusammiWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 11Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
Nicey SenseiWon 16/19Follow79.2%Win Rate +51.8%ROI 26Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
4
Lee HongWon 15/17Follow78.3%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
peter habakkukFollow76.5%Win Rate +32.9%ROI 38Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
6
bensalemWon 10/13Follow75%Win Rate +32.8%ROI 16Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
footy memeKazan Rubin has had an inconsistent start to the season. In the first round of the Russian Cup group stage, they suffered a heavy away defeat to Rodina, revealing significant defensive flaws. As a result, their chances of advancing from the group are now precarious, and they must strive for points in this home game to keep their hopes alive. In the league, Kazan Rubin shows resilience at home. They have drawn their last two matches, preferring a midfield - centric game and creating threats through counter - attacks and set - pieces. However, their overall defensive stability is a major concern. They often make mistakes in back - field coordination and are vulnerable to high - intensity, continuous attacks, easily conceding goals. Moscow Spartak, a strong team in the Russian Premier League, has a significantly higher overall squad value and stronger hard power compared to Rubin Kazan. In the first round of the Russian Cup group stage, they thrashed Orenburg at home, showing full offensiO/U
RUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Boki 2KThe home team is in good form recently, maintaining an unbeaten record in multiple consecutive matches. Their attacking end has been outstanding, and their defense has reached an excellent level. This season, the home team has performed better at home than away. Their points in this season rely heavily on home - games. Therefore, the odds favor the home team significantly. In contrast, the away team's current situation is just average and lags behind the home team. The away team lacks good wingers. Their only threat comes from the middle - field penetration, and they don't have a super - strong striker, which results in a weak scoring ability. Based on the comparison of the two teams' strengths, the home team clearly has an advantage. Moscow Spartak is a top - tier team in Russia. In their group's first game, they had a resounding 5 - 1 victory, grabbing 3 crucial points. This shows their potent offensive firepower. The team boasts an ample squad depth. There are multiple goal - scorerAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠Kazan Rubin has shown distinct offensive and defensive characteristics in recent matches. In their past five official games, they've achieved a record of 1 win, 3 draws, and 1 loss. In an away Russian Cup game, they thrashed Rodina Moscow 5 - 0, which clearly demonstrated their offensive efficiency. Leading 1 - 0 at halftime and then winning 5 - 0 overall, they showed great ability to convert opportunities. However, they lost 1 - 3 at home against Krasnodar, revealing some defensive weaknesses. On the other hand, their 1 - 1 draws against Rostov and Orenburg Gazovik indicated their stable competitiveness at home. In terms of corner - kick data, their 7 - 1 home win against Orenburg and 5 - 2 away victory over Rodina Moscow highlighted their active involvement in wing attacks and good control of the ball - possession rhythm. This data might be a crucial support for the team's tactical implementation. In recent friendly matches, their home win of 2 - 0 against Sovetskiy Soyuz and 1 - 2 hAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
RUS Cup
More Recommend
-
I specialize in match analysis and offer top - notch selections. In this Romanian League encounter, Cluj shows a significant edge over Universitatea Cluj. Offensively, Cluj's conversion rate at the final third is 12% higher than its opponent. The xG value stands at 1.8 compared to 0.9. With a key passing success rate of 78%, it leads the league. The value of forward passes is 12.3 against 8.6. Defensively, Cluj has 15 midfield interceptions compared to 9 of its rival. It also covers 2.1 kilometers more in high - intensity sprints. With 12 tackles and 8 interceptions, its defensive statistics are comprehensively superior. The total running distance of Cluj is 112.4 kilometers, ahead of 108.6 kilometers of the opponent, indicating better physical reserves. In the back - field, Cluj has 7 clearances, suppressing the opponent's 4, which shows stronger defensive stability. Moreover, Cluj's shot - on - target rate is 45%, far exceeding the away team's 28%. The conversion rate of scoring oppoAH
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post