Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
xuxusammiWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 11Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
Lee HongWon 15/17Follow78.3%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
peter habakkukFollow76.5%Win Rate +32.9%ROI 38Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
5
Fernando GiordanoFollow75%Win Rate +27.1%ROI 21Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
6
bensalemWon 10/13Follow75%Win Rate +32.8%ROI 16Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
freekbassKazan Rubin shows clear offensive superiority over Spartak Moscow. Their full - field offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, better than Spartak Moscow's 14.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.21 to 0.93 further emphasizes their edge in the attacking end. In terms of passing, Kazan Rubin's key pass success rate is 62%, leading Spartak Moscow's 55%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.83 compared to 1.35 of their opponents, posing a greater threat. The midfield possession rate gap, with Kazan Rubin holding 58% and Spartak Moscow at 42%, reflects their control of the game rhythm. Their average transition speed is 12.7 seconds, faster than Spartak Moscow's 15.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total team running distance of Kazan Rubin is 112.3 km, 2.6 km more than their opponents. The high - intensity sprint count of 23 to 18 also shows their better physical reserves. Overall, considering these aspects, Kazan Rubin has a strong chance in the game. Moscow Spartak is exAH
RUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
footy memeKazan Rubin has had an inconsistent start to the season. In the first round of the Russian Cup group stage, they suffered a heavy away defeat to Rodina, revealing significant defensive flaws. As a result, their chances of advancing from the group are now precarious, and they must strive for points in this home game to keep their hopes alive. In the league, Kazan Rubin shows resilience at home. They have drawn their last two matches, preferring a midfield - centric game and creating threats through counter - attacks and set - pieces. However, their overall defensive stability is a major concern. They often make mistakes in back - field coordination and are vulnerable to high - intensity, continuous attacks, easily conceding goals. Moscow Spartak, a strong team in the Russian Premier League, has a significantly higher overall squad value and stronger hard power compared to Rubin Kazan. In the first round of the Russian Cup group stage, they thrashed Orenburg at home, showing full offensiO/URUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Iqbal ahmadI'm a professional analyst with a team, and we conduct in - depth analysis of selected matches daily. Krasnodar has shown superiority in several key offensive aspects compared to Spartak Moscow. Krasnodar's offensive conversion rate is 12% higher. They also have 1.8 more valuable forward passes per 90 minutes and a 7 - percentage - point lead in key pass success rate. As the home team, Krasnodar dominates midfield control, with a rate reaching 58%. They have a faster transition speed, run 4.2 kilometers more in the whole game, and have 15 more high - intensity sprints. On the other hand, Spartak Moscow, as the away team, has underperformed in the defensive department. Their statistics for tackles and interceptions are below the league average. With only 12 clearances, they rank among the bottom in the Russian Premier League. Kazan Rubin has been in good form on the offensive end, creating 2.3 expected goals (xG) opportunities and boasting a conversion rate of scoring chances as high asO/URUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
RUS Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post