Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
xuxusammiWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 11Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
Nicey SenseiWon 16/19Follow79.2%Win Rate +51.8%ROI 26Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
4
Lee HongWon 15/17Follow78.3%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
peter habakkukFollow76.5%Win Rate +32.9%ROI 38Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
6
bensalemWon 10/13Follow75%Win Rate +32.8%ROI 16Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
freekbassKazan Rubin shows clear offensive superiority over Spartak Moscow. Their full - field offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, better than Spartak Moscow's 14.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.21 to 0.93 further emphasizes their edge in the attacking end. In terms of passing, Kazan Rubin's key pass success rate is 62%, leading Spartak Moscow's 55%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.83 compared to 1.35 of their opponents, posing a greater threat. The midfield possession rate gap, with Kazan Rubin holding 58% and Spartak Moscow at 42%, reflects their control of the game rhythm. Their average transition speed is 12.7 seconds, faster than Spartak Moscow's 15.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total team running distance of Kazan Rubin is 112.3 km, 2.6 km more than their opponents. The high - intensity sprint count of 23 to 18 also shows their better physical reserves. Overall, considering these aspects, Kazan Rubin has a strong chance in the game. Moscow Spartak is exAH
RUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Harry potter polarKazan Rubin's performance in the league this season has been rather inconsistent. In terms of the league standings, they only managed to accumulate 5 points in the first 4 rounds, ranking 8th with a win rate of just 25%. Their home - field performance has been particularly poor. In their two home games, they drew one and lost one, with a win rate of 0% at home and a goal difference of - 2, clearly showing a "home underdog" image. Looking at the offensive end, Kazan Rubin has an average of 1.25 goals per game, which isn't too bad. However, their defense has many flaws, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per game. Moreover, the absence of key defensive players recently has made their already shaky defense even worse. In addition, in the last 5 direct encounters with the visiting team, they lost 3 games, which puts them at a significant disadvantage in the head - to - head record. Considering all these factors, I'd give a five - star recommendation. Despite the fact that Kazan Rubin showsAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
amvnI'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing high - quality information. This analysis is tailored for dedicated fans and serious bettors. In terms of offensive efficiency, Rubin Kazan has a lower conversion rate of 18%, while Spartak Moscow boasts a 24% conversion rate. The expected goals (xG) value also favors Spartak Moscow, with 1.8 compared to Rubin Kazan's 1.2. When it comes to passing, Spartak Moscow shows superiority. Their key passing success rate stands at 62%, leading Rubin Kazan's 55%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.3, higher than the 0.9 of the home team. Defensively, although Rubin Kazan has more midfield interceptions (12 times compared to 9), Spartak Moscow shines in terms of tackles. They made 15 tackles, significantly more than the 8 of the home side. In terms of physical performance, the away team, Spartak Moscow, has more high - intensity sprints, with 11 compared to the home team's 7. Their running distanceAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
RUS Cup
More Recommend
-
Kluge is playing at home. In terms of the offensive end, its conversion rate of offensive finishes reaches as high as 18.7%, far exceeding Cluj University's 9.2%. Its expected goals efficiency (xG/Offensive Finish) is 0.16, ranking among the top five in the league. The key pass success rate of Kluge is 73.4%, and the front - court passing value index reaches 12.8, significantly better than the opponent's 61.1% and 8.9. In terms of midfield control, Kluge has a ball - possession rate of 62%. The average short - pass success rate is 91.3%, and the speed of fast - break advancement reaches 28.4 km/h, far exceeding the opponent's 21.1 km/h. In running data, Kluge has a total of 412 high - intensity sprints throughout the game, and the average running distance reaches 112.3 kilometers. Its physical fitness reserve and coverage density are clearly superior. Join me to stay updated on more match analyses！ Cluj has been solid at the back, averaging 8.7 tackles, 6.3 interceptions, and 14.1 clAH
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post