Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
xuxusammiWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 11Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
Lee HongWon 15/17Follow78.3%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
peter habakkukFollow76.5%Win Rate +32.9%ROI 38Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
5
Fernando GiordanoFollow75%Win Rate +27.1%ROI 21Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
6
bensalemWon 10/13Follow75%Win Rate +32.8%ROI 16Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing high - quality information. This analysis is tailored for dedicated fans and serious bettors.
In terms of offensive efficiency, Rubin Kazan has a lower conversion rate of 18%, while Spartak Moscow boasts a 24% conversion rate. The expected goals (xG) value also favors Spartak Moscow, with 1.8 compared to Rubin Kazan's 1.2.
When it comes to passing, Spartak Moscow shows superiority. Their key passing success rate stands at 62%, leading Rubin Kazan's 55%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.3, higher than the 0.9 of the home team.
Defensively, although Rubin Kazan has more midfield interceptions (12 times compared to 9), Spartak Moscow shines in terms of tackles. They made 15 tackles, significantly more than the 8 of the home side.
In terms of physical performance, the away team, Spartak Moscow, has more high - intensity sprints, with 11 compared to the home team's 7. Their running distance is also longer, reaching 11,200 meters, while Rubin Kazan has covered 10,800 meters.
Further Reading
-
Eldy FebriansyahThe historical head - to - head records between FC Rubin Kazan and FC Spartak Moscow reveal their tactical characteristics and offensive - defensive efficiency. Looking back at their recent encounters, in a club friendly, Moscow Spartak played to a goalless draw away against Kazan Rubin, yet they dominated in corner kicks with a 7 - 2 lead. In a Russian Premier League match, Moscow Spartak defeated Kazan Rubin 2 - 1 on the road, also leading in corner kicks 6 - 3. In another Russian Premier League game, Kazan Rubin lost 0 - 2 at home. The 4 - 3 corner - kick count indicated that the away team, Moscow Spartak, had more ball possession. It's worth noting that although Kazan Rubin won 2 - 1 at home once, the 1 - 9 corner - kick data showed their low efficiency in creating threats in the attacking third. Moreover, Moscow Spartak won 3 - 1 away, and even though they had fewer corner kicks (3 - 6), they still maintained an advantage in corner kicks in away games. These historical records canO/U
RUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠Kazan Rubin has shown distinct offensive and defensive characteristics in recent matches. In their past five official games, they've achieved a record of 1 win, 3 draws, and 1 loss. In an away Russian Cup game, they thrashed Rodina Moscow 5 - 0, which clearly demonstrated their offensive efficiency. Leading 1 - 0 at halftime and then winning 5 - 0 overall, they showed great ability to convert opportunities. However, they lost 1 - 3 at home against Krasnodar, revealing some defensive weaknesses. On the other hand, their 1 - 1 draws against Rostov and Orenburg Gazovik indicated their stable competitiveness at home. In terms of corner - kick data, their 7 - 1 home win against Orenburg and 5 - 2 away victory over Rodina Moscow highlighted their active involvement in wing attacks and good control of the ball - possession rhythm. This data might be a crucial support for the team's tactical implementation. In recent friendly matches, their home win of 2 - 0 against Sovetskiy Soyuz and 1 - 2 hAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
u cant ansI've been meticulously researching football matches and here's my analysis of the encounter between Rubin Kazan and Spartak Moscow. Rubin Kazan shows a better performance in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Rubin Kazan's is 18.6%, superior to Spartak Moscow's 14.2%. The xG efficiency of Rubin Kazan is 0.78, while that of Spartak Moscow is only 0.59. Regarding key passing, Rubin Kazan's success rate stands at 62%, leading Spartak Moscow's 53%. The value of forward passes for Rubin Kazan is 1.21, higher than 0.87 of their opponents. In midfield control, Rubin Kazan averages 47 effective passes per game, and their transition speed is 1.8 times per minute, faster than Spartak Moscow's 1.3 times. The whole team of Rubin Kazan runs an average of 11.3 km and has 32 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than Spartak Moscow's 10.7 km and 24 sprints respectively. On the defensive end, Rubin Kazan records 18 tackles, 12 interceptions and 9 clearances, comprehenAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
RUS Cup
