Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
SPORT249Won 9/9Follow90%Win Rate +19.9%ROI 12Tips 1.49Avg Odds -
2
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
3
ZyDONNN😎Follow80%Win Rate +40.2%ROI 15Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
4
えめるいWon 4/4Follow80%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
Kon kha laFollow80%Win Rate +45.5%ROI 11Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
6
88SOCCERWon 8/10Follow80%Win Rate +13.7%ROI 10Tips 1.41Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
EkayaTrailing in the standings, Atlanta is under pressure to improve its performance. The team has been inconsistent this season, with a win rate of 40%, a draw rate of 30%, and a loss rate of 30%. They average 1.5 goals per game, 3.1 corner kicks, and concede 1.2 goals on defense. On the other hand, Tel Aviv Hapoel is leading the pack with an outstanding record of 50% wins, 40% draws, and only 10% losses. They average 1.7 goals per game, 4.4 corner kicks, and concede just 1.1 goals on defense. The difference in offensive efficiency between the two teams is significant. Tel Aviv Hapoel outscores Atlanta by an average of 0.2 goals per game and has better control over corner kicks. This reflects the team's stronger execution of flanking attacks and set-piece tactics. In this match, the battle will likely center around the efficiency of both teams' offense and defense. Atlanta needs to step up its game to keep up with Tel Aviv Hapoel, while the latter will look to maintain its high level of peO/U
UEFA ECL
Atalanta
0-0 Hapoel Tel Aviv
-
Alex RussellAtlanta has shown a polarized situation in attack and defense recently. In an away game, they thrashed Schalke 04 3 - 0, with a corner - kick statistic of 12 to 2, demonstrating their dominant ball - control ability. However, in a home game against Athletic Bilbao, they only won 1 - 0, and the corner - kick data of 1 to 4 revealed obvious weaknesses in their defense. During the Serie A season, there was a contrast between a 0 - 0 home draw against Genoa (6 - 2 in corner kicks) and a 0 - 1 away defeat against Bologna (2 - 5 in corner kicks). This shows that they urgently need to enhance the balance between attack and defense. In the Italian Cup, although they drew 1 - 1 with Lazio at home (6 - 5 in corner kicks) without a win, their attacking end was constantly productive, and the corner - kick data reflected the threat from set - pieces. On the other hand, Maccabi Tel Aviv has been more stable in the UEFA Europa Conference League. They defeated GKS Katowice 2 - 1 away (7 - 3 in cornerO/UUEFA ECL
Atalanta
0-0 Hapoel Tel Aviv
-
Adin ReportsAtlanta has been struggling with its offensive efficiency. The team's offensive conversion rate stands at 10.2%, lower compared to the league average of 14%. Its xG efficiency is also just 0.83. On the other hand, Maccabi Tel Aviv is even weaker in attack. The team's conversion rate is only 8.4%, and the xG efficiency is 0.71. In terms of passing, Atlanta's key - pass success rate is 24.4%, and the value of forward - field passes is only 0.8 times per 90 minutes. Maccabi Tel Aviv has a key - pass success rate of 20.1% and shows a lack of ability to organize in the front court. Atlanta's midfield has a high ball - possession rate of 62.3%. However, the team is slow in transitioning from defense to attack, taking an average of 14.8 seconds per attack, which fails to connect effectively with the front - line players. The total running distance of the whole team is 111.4 km, but there are only 14.7 high - intensity sprints, indicating a dull game rhythm and a lack of explosive power. AtlanO/UUEFA ECL
Atalanta
0-0 Hapoel Tel Aviv
UEFA ECL
More Recommend
-
In the recent history of their encounters in the Romanian League, the home - team has shown a remarkable advantage. Let's take a look at the past matches. In a previous game, Cluj won 1 - 0 at home. They had 7 corner kicks compared to their opponent's 2. The score was 0 - 0 in the first half, which demonstrated their strong defensive resilience. In another match, Cluj narrowly won 3 - 2 at home. Although the corner - kick count was 2 - 8 in favor of the opponent, they led 3 - 1 in the first half and showed solid control of the game after taking the lead. There was also a 1 - 0 victory for Cluj at home. They managed to score in the first half and kept a high - efficiency defense throughout the game, with 6 corner kicks against 4 of the opponent. In a more one - sided encounter, Cluj thrashed their opponents 4 - 0 at home. Even though the corner - kick situation was 3 - 10 against them, they led 2 - 0 in the first half, which further strengthened the psychological edge of the home - teamO/U
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post