Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> u cant ans>

    SV Waldhof Mannheim VS Kaiserslautern

    Germany Cup
    Analysis More Tips
    SV Waldhof Mannheim
    SV Waldhof Mannheim 0
    0 Kaiserslautern
    Kaiserslautern
    Further Reading
    • RBB LEXIS
      RBB LEXIS
      The recent data of Mannheim and Kaiserslautern show significant differences. Mannheim has been in excellent form at home this season. With a home - win rate of 75%, they've been quite efficient in both attack and defense. In 10 home matches, they scored 10 goals while conceding only 4. Their average goals per game are 2.5, and the goal difference is 6, placing them among the top in the league in terms of offensive and defensive efficiency. Looking at the overall league statistics, Mannheim played 20 games, achieving 10 wins, 2 draws, and 8 losses. They scored 20 goals and conceded 18, with a goal difference of 2 and an average of 2.0 goals per game. The draw rate of only 10% reflects their strong determination to win. On the other hand, Kaiserslautern's away performance has been rather mediocre. Their away - win rate stands at 42.8%. In 10 away games, they scored 10 goals and conceded 9, with a goal difference of 1 and an average of 1.42 goals per game. The overall win rate of 40% (12
      AH
      GERC SV Waldhof Mannheim 0-0 Kaiserslautern
    • Erdem Bitik
      Erdem Bitik
      Mannheim has a record of 5 wins, 1 draw, and 4 losses in their last 10 matches. On the other hand, Kaiserslautern has 4 wins, 3 draws, and 3 losses in the same period. The recent performance of Kaiserslautern is different from that of Mannheim, which has significantly boosted the morale of their players. Although Kaiserslautern's performance shows a certain gap compared to Mannheim, in terms of overall strength, Kaiserslautern holds an edge. However, Mannheim has also been in good form recently, with a strong attack and a solid defense. Looking at their past encounters, there have been plenty of goals. Mannheim has a high - scoring record and a decent defense. The home team, Mannheim, has maintained a good state recently, but the away team, Kaiserslautern, is stronger in terms of strength. Mannheim's performance in this game has been remarkable. So, the question remains: which team can seize the initiative in this match? Mannheim has shown good form recently, winning 5, drawing 1, and
      AH
      GERC SV Waldhof Mannheim 0-0 Kaiserslautern
    • Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Mannheim hosts Kaiserslautern in the German Cup. Mannheim has been dominant at home this season, boasting a 75% win - rate. In home games, they've scored 10 goals while conceding only 4, with a goal difference of 6 and an average of 2.5 goals per game. This shows their dual advantages of efficient offense and solid defense. Notably, Mannheim has no draw records at home, and both their win - rate and unbeaten rate remain high. The statistics of 3.4 corner kicks and 1.4 yellow cards per game further confirm the balance of their offensive and defensive systems. On the other hand, Kaiserslautern, as the away team, has an away win - rate of only 42.8%. In away games, they've scored 10 goals and conceded 9, with a goal difference of just 1 and an average of 1.42 goals per game. Their offensive and defensive efficiency is relatively mediocre. Kaiserslautern's away - game stats, with an average of 3.6 corners and 1.6 yellow cards per game, indicate that their away - game tactics focus on ball
      AH
      GERC SV Waldhof Mannheim 0-0 Kaiserslautern
    More Recommend
    • I've conducted in - depth research on this match. In terms of offensive performance, Puebla has a better conversion rate of 18.2% compared to Santos Laguna's 15.6%. The xG efficiency of Puebla is 0.78, while Santos Laguna's is 0.62. Puebla also leads in key passes. Its success rate of key passes is 62%, higher than Santos Laguna's 54%. The value of forward passes for Puebla is 12.3, which is greater than the 9.8 of its opponent. When it comes to midfield control, Puebla has an average ball - possession rate of 58% and a passing success rate of 81%. The conversion speed is 1.2 times per minute, faster than Santos Laguna's 0.9 times per minute. In terms of running statistics, Puebla runs 112 km in a game and has 23 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than Santos Laguna's 101.4 km and 18 times respectively. On the defensive end, Puebla's performance is also better. It has 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, compared to Santos Laguna's 11, 7, and 4. Overall, Puebla
      AH
      MEX D1 Puebla - Santos Laguna
    • I've conducted in - depth research on this match. In terms of offensive efficiency, Philadelphia Union has shown better results. Their average offensive conversion rate is 18.2%, while Austin FC's is only 14.4%. The xG efficiency value of Philadelphia Union is 1.2, which is more advantageous than Austin FC's 0.8. When it comes to passing data, Philadelphia Union also takes the lead. Their key passing success rate is 42%, compared to Austin FC's 35%. The value of their forward - field passes reaches 8.7 points per 90 minutes. In midfield control, Philadelphia Union has an average of 12.3 tackles per game, and their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession, faster than Austin FC's 2.4 seconds. Looking at the running statistics, the whole team of Philadelphia Union runs an average of 11.3 kilometers per game, with 23 high - intensity sprints per game. These are higher than Austin FC's 10.8 kilometers and 18 sprints. Overall, Philadelphia Union seems to have an edge in multiple aspec
      AH
      MLS Austin FC - Philadelphia Union
    • I've conducted in - depth research on football matches and made a super - selective analysis. In the performance comparison between Los Angeles FC and Portland Timbers, the latter shows significant advantages. Portland Timbers have an average of 4.2 shots on target per game in their last 5 matches, with a conversion rate of 18.3%, which is better than Los Angeles FC's 14.7%. The xG efficiency of Portland Timbers reaches 0.72, while that of Los Angeles FC is only 0.55. In terms of passing, Portland Timbers' key - pass success rate is 68%, leading Los Angeles FC. The value of their forward - field passes is 11.3 times per 90 minutes. They also have a 61% midfield ball - possession rate compared to Los Angeles FC's 54%, and their transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster per possession. In terms of physical performance, the whole team of Portland Timbers runs 112.3 km and has 42 high - intensity sprints, both of which are higher than those of Los Angeles FC. On the defensive end, Portland Ti
      AH
      MLS Los Angeles FC - Portland Timbers
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.