Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Ingram⚪🔴Follow87.5%Win Rate +55.2%ROI 18Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
Francis JumbaWon 6/7Follow80%Win Rate +47%ROI 20Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
3
Funny MemesFollow80%Win Rate +36.9%ROI 10Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
4
mata jalyWon 12/14Follow78.9%Win Rate +30.6%ROI 19Tips 1.76Avg Odds -
5
PhilegrayFollow78.6%Win Rate +28.2%ROI 28Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
Football 24/7Follow77.3%Win Rate +39%ROI 23Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Opinologo de escritorioCincinnati plays at home, adopting a 3-4-1-2 formation. They have an average home ball possession of 49% and a passing success rate of 81%. They rely on the full - backs pushing forward to widen the pitch. Through - balls in the flanks and set - pieces are their main scoring methods. Their home offensive output is sufficient. The team's competitive form is on the up, but there are potential problems in their defensive coordination. When the full - backs charge forward, there are large gaps behind them, which increases the pressure on them to make up for positions during fast - paced transitions. On the other hand, Seattle Sounders play a 4-2-3-1 formation away from home, with an away ball possession of 45%. They are good at launching counter - attacks after midfield interceptions, and their attacks on the wings are quite threatening. However, they have been in a slump recently. When facing continuous pressure on the road, their flank defenses are prone to expose vulnerabilities. The miAH
MLS
FC Cincinnati
0-0
Seattle Sounders
-
Pi314Cincinnati has been showing a stable performance on the offensive end recently. Their average offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, higher than the league average. The value of their forward passes reaches 4.2 times per 90 minutes, and their key pass success rate is 62%, ranking among the top five in the league. On the other hand, Seattle Sounders have slightly weaker midfield control. Their average number of interceptions per game is 11.7, 2.3 less than their opponents. However, they cover a running distance of 112.4 kilometers, with 15% more high - intensity sprints than their opponents. The xG comparison between the two teams shows that Cincinnati has an offensive threat value 0.4 expected goals higher. On the defensive end, their tackle efficiency is 68%, and they have 3 fewer clearances than their opponents. In terms of midfield transition speed, Cincinnati can complete the offensive - defensive transition in an average of 7.2 seconds, 1.4 seconds faster than their opponents.AHMLS
FC Cincinnati
0-0
Seattle Sounders
-
chaos007Cincinnati, playing at home, adopts a 3 - 4 - 1 - 2 formation. They maintain an average of 49% ball possession and an 81% passing success rate at home. By pushing forward their wing - backs to create width, through - balls in the flanks and set - pieces are their main scoring methods, resulting in a strong home offensive output. The team is in good form, but there are issues in their defensive coordination. When the wing - backs push forward, there are large gaps behind them, increasing the pressure on the defense during fast - counter situations. On the other hand, the Seattle Sounders play a 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 formation away from home. They hold the ball for about 45% of the time on the road. They are good at launching counter - attacks after midfield interceptions, with their wide attacks posing a significant threat. However, they have been in a slump recently. When facing continuous pressure away from home, their flank defense is prone to exposing weaknesses. The midfield battle will beAHMLS
FC Cincinnati
0-0
Seattle Sounders
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post