Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> u cant ans>

    Slavia Praha VS Bohemians 1905

    Czech Republic Gambrinus Liga
    Analysis More Tips
    Slavia Praha
    Slavia Praha 2
    2 Bohemians 1905
    Bohemians 1905
    Further Reading
    • Pi314
      Pi314
      In the Champions League encounter between Prague Slavia and Bohemian 1905, Prague Slavia shows strong advantages. In terms of offensive conversion, Prague Slavia has a 18.3% conversion rate, better than Bohemian 1905's 14.1%. The xG efficiency values, 0.78 versus 0.59, also demonstrate Prague Slavia's stronger offensive conversion ability. Regarding passing, Prague Slavia has a 62% key - pass success rate compared to Bohemian 1905's 49%. The value of front - field passes is 12.7 to 9.3, indicating better ball - control quality. In the midfield, Prague Slavia makes more interceptions, with a 14 - to - 9 count. Their tackle success rate is 68%, much higher than Bohemian 1905's 52%, which allows for a quicker attack - defense transition. In terms of physical performance, Prague Slavia runs 112.3 km in the game compared to 108.6 km of Bohemian 1905. The number of high - intensity sprints is 41 to 28, showing better physical reserves. On the defensive end, Prague Slavia has more clearances
      AH
      CZE D1 Slavia Praha 2-2 Bohemians 1905
    • BigMoh jr
      BigMoh jr Won 4/6
      Prague Slavia has been struggling in their league home games. Statistics show that the team's win rate at home this season is a mere 0%. Draws account for 60% of their home matches, and losses make up 40%. They average 1.2 goals per game, concede 2.0 goals per game, and have a negative goal difference of -2. The home defense has significant issues. With an average of 2.0 goals conceded per game, 8 out of the total 12 goals they've conceded this season came from home games. The team faces problems of both weak offense and unstable defense. Their tactical style fails to work effectively at home, and the stability shown by an average of 5.4 corner kicks and 1.8 yellow cards per game hasn't translated into real advantages. On the other hand, Bohemians 1905 has demonstrated excellent tactical execution in away games.
      AH
      CZE D1 Slavia Praha 2-2 Bohemians 1905
    • $ex money drugs
      $ex money drugs
      Prague Slavia has been in a stable form recently and is in high spirits. On the contrary, Bohemian 1905 has failed to win in their last two games, with inconsistent performances, which might have dampened their morale. In terms of the league standings, both teams are in the middle of the table, facing less competitive pressure but also lacking the drive to push forward. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, Prague Slavia holds an edge. They've had more wins than losses in the last five meetings, giving them a psychological advantage. Bohemian 1905, on the other hand, is at a disadvantage and may carry a heavier mental burden when playing away. Regarding the squad's fitness, both teams have no injury or suspension reports, which means their tactical implementations won't be affected. Overall, Prague Slavia is on an obvious upward trend with a strong winning streak. The question now is whether they can secure a big home win over Bohemian 1905. Prague Slavia has been in a st
      AH
      CZE D1 Slavia Praha 2-2 Bohemians 1905
    More Recommend
    • I've conducted in - depth research on this match. In terms of offensive performance, Puebla has a better conversion rate of 18.2% compared to Santos Laguna's 15.6%. The xG efficiency of Puebla is 0.78, while Santos Laguna's is 0.62. Puebla also leads in key passes. Its success rate of key passes is 62%, higher than Santos Laguna's 54%. The value of forward passes for Puebla is 12.3, which is greater than the 9.8 of its opponent. When it comes to midfield control, Puebla has an average ball - possession rate of 58% and a passing success rate of 81%. The conversion speed is 1.2 times per minute, faster than Santos Laguna's 0.9 times per minute. In terms of running statistics, Puebla runs 112 km in a game and has 23 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than Santos Laguna's 101.4 km and 18 times respectively. On the defensive end, Puebla's performance is also better. It has 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, compared to Santos Laguna's 11, 7, and 4. Overall, Puebla
      AH
      MEX D1 Puebla - Santos Laguna
    • I've conducted in - depth research on this match. In terms of offensive efficiency, Philadelphia Union has shown better results. Their average offensive conversion rate is 18.2%, while Austin FC's is only 14.4%. The xG efficiency value of Philadelphia Union is 1.2, which is more advantageous than Austin FC's 0.8. When it comes to passing data, Philadelphia Union also takes the lead. Their key passing success rate is 42%, compared to Austin FC's 35%. The value of their forward - field passes reaches 8.7 points per 90 minutes. In midfield control, Philadelphia Union has an average of 12.3 tackles per game, and their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession, faster than Austin FC's 2.4 seconds. Looking at the running statistics, the whole team of Philadelphia Union runs an average of 11.3 kilometers per game, with 23 high - intensity sprints per game. These are higher than Austin FC's 10.8 kilometers and 18 sprints. Overall, Philadelphia Union seems to have an edge in multiple aspec
      AH
      MLS Austin FC - Philadelphia Union
    • I've conducted in - depth research on football matches and made a super - selective analysis. In the performance comparison between Los Angeles FC and Portland Timbers, the latter shows significant advantages. Portland Timbers have an average of 4.2 shots on target per game in their last 5 matches, with a conversion rate of 18.3%, which is better than Los Angeles FC's 14.7%. The xG efficiency of Portland Timbers reaches 0.72, while that of Los Angeles FC is only 0.55. In terms of passing, Portland Timbers' key - pass success rate is 68%, leading Los Angeles FC. The value of their forward - field passes is 11.3 times per 90 minutes. They also have a 61% midfield ball - possession rate compared to Los Angeles FC's 54%, and their transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster per possession. In terms of physical performance, the whole team of Portland Timbers runs 112.3 km and has 42 high - intensity sprints, both of which are higher than those of Los Angeles FC. On the defensive end, Portland Ti
      AH
      MLS Los Angeles FC - Portland Timbers
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.