Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Mbah_tipsterFollow90.9%Win Rate +56.4%ROI 11Tips 1.77Avg Odds -
2
Ingram⚪🔴Won 9/9Follow88.9%Win Rate +56.4%ROI 20Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
3
mata jalyWon 6/7Follow81.8%Win Rate +34.6%ROI 22Tips 1.75Avg Odds -
4
PhilegrayWon 8/8Follow80%Win Rate +31.6%ROI 30Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
5
OssOssOssWon 9/10Follow78.9%Win Rate +41%ROI 20Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
haappyjqFollow77.3%Win Rate +39.8%ROI 22Tips 1.89Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
EruditeRiver Plate has shown a significant edge in home games against Sarmiento. In the past three league encounters, they've achieved two wins and one draw. Notably, the 5 - 0 victory was particularly outstanding, with a 4 - 0 lead in the first half, highlighting River Plate's dominant offensive power at home. Statistics reveal that River Plate has an average of 2.3 goals per home game this season, with only 0.7 goals conceded. This places their offensive and defensive efficiency among the top in the league. On the other hand, Sarmiento, as the away team, has one draw and two losses in their last three matches against River Plate. The 0 - 5 defeat in one game exposed their defensive vulnerabilities. In terms of corner kicks, River Plate has slightly fewer corner kicks in home games against Sarmiento. However, their high - efficiency offensive conversion rate is the key factor for victory. Sarsfield typically employs a defensive - counterattacking strategy. However, their offensive efficiencyAH
ARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
-
Olavi VaisanenRiver Plate has had a poor overall performance this season. Their win rate stands at only 20%, while the loss rate is as high as 60%. Both their offense and defense show signs of fatigue. Statistics indicate that River Plate scores only one goal per game on average, but concedes 1.2. With a total of 10 goals scored and 12 conceded, the negative goal difference of -2 reflects both low offensive efficiency and defensive vulnerabilities. However, the team performs decently in ball - control and organization.AHARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
-
El CapitanIn comparing the offensive and defensive data between River Plate and Sarmiento, River Plate shows an edge in offensive conversion rate, with 18.2% compared to Sarmiento's 14.4%. However, Sarmiento is more efficient in xG, with a value of 1.2 against River Plate's 0.9. In terms of key passes, River Plate has a significant advantage. Its key pass success rate stands at 67%, notably higher than Sarmiento's 52%. Also, River Plate leads in the value of forward passes, with a figure of 3.8 compared to Sarmiento's 2.4. Defensively, Sarmiento outperforms River Plate in midfield interceptions. Sarmiento has 12 interceptions, while River Plate only manages 8. But when it comes to physical performance, River Plate takes the lead. The team covers a total running distance of 118km and records 42 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing Sarmiento. Sarmiento has had a poor run in their last four home matches in the Argentine Primera División, with a record of just 1 win and 3 losses. TheyAHARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
ARG D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post