Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Andie Peci>

    Fulham VS Chelsea

    English Premier League
    Analysis More Tips
    Fulham
    Fulham
    Chelsea
    Chelsea
    Further Reading
    • b3ndar
      b3ndar Won 8/11
      Fulham has shown remarkable strength at home in this Premier League season. In 19 home games, they've achieved an 11 - win, 2 - draw, and 6 - loss record, boasting a win - rate as high as 57.9%. Their attacking line has netted 30 goals, while the defense has conceded only 20. With a goal difference of +10, they've amassed 35 home - game points, ranking 6th in the league. On average, Fulham scores 1.58 goals per home game and concedes 1.05. This indicates that their offensive and defensive efficiency at home far surpasses that on the road. In contrast, Chelsea, despite having a certain foundation in away games, has seen a sharp decline in form recently. In 19 away games, they've won 7, drawn 5, and lost 7, with a win - rate of 36.8%.
      O/U
      ENG PR Fulham - Chelsea
    • Rowland🤍
      Rowland🤍
      Fulham has shown excellent performance at home this season. In 19 home games, they've achieved 11 wins, 2 draws, and 6 losses, scoring 30 goals and conceding 20, with a goal difference of +10. Their winning rate is as high as 57.9%, ranking 6th among home teams in the league. The team has outstanding offensive and defensive efficiency at home. They average 1.57 goals per game and concede only 1.05, demonstrating strong home - field dominance. On the other hand, Chelsea's away - game ability is somewhat reliable. In 19 away games, they have 7 wins, 5 draws, and 7 losses, scoring 32 goals and conceding 27, with a goal difference of +5. Their winning rate is 36.8%. However, their recent form is a concern. In the last 6 away games, they have only 1 win, 1 draw, and 4 losses, scoring 5 goals and conceding 11, with a goal difference of -6. Their winning rate has dropped to 16.7%. There are more loopholes in their defense, conceding an average of 1.83 goals per game, far higher than the seaso
      O/U
      ENG PR Fulham - Chelsea
    • ONUKE IFEANYI
      ONUKE IFEANYI
      Fulham's home form this season has been at a top - tier level in the Premier League. In 19 home games, they've achieved 11 wins, 2 draws, and 6 losses. They've scored 30 goals while conceding only 20, with a goal difference of +10 and a win rate of 57.9%, ranking 6th in the home standings. The team's offensive and defensive efficiency at home is particularly remarkable. On offense, they average 1.58 goals per game (30 goals in total). On defense, they only concede 1.05 goals per game (20 goals in total), showing strong home - field dominance. In the last six games, Fulham has 2 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, scoring 4 goals and conceding 5. Although their form has fluctuated, they've remained generally stable, with a smooth offensive - defensive transition. The goal - difference advantage and high win rate at home often allow Fulham to control the game rhythm. Chelsea's away form this season has also had its moments. In 19 away games, they've got 7 wins, 5 draws, and 7 losses. They've sc
      O/U
      ENG PR Fulham - Chelsea
    More Recommend
    • Bologna is playing at home, but in the last five games, their offensive end has a conversion rate of only 8.2% in finishing attacks, which is lower than the league average of 11.4%. On the other hand, Lazio has an expected goals per game efficiency of 1.34, ranking among the top four in Serie A. Their quality of finishing attacks is notably better. In terms of key pass success rate, Lazio reaches 76.8%, higher than Bologna's 68.1%. The value index of their forward passes is 23% higher. In midfield control, Lazio has an average ball - possession rate of 58.4%. Their conversion speed is 4.2 effective advances per minute, significantly faster than the home team's 3.1 times. Looking at the running data, Lazio has a total high - intensity sprint distance of 1,280 meters throughout the game, 19% more than Bologna. They cover a wider area and have a higher pressing efficiency. So, how should we interpret the direction of this game? I welcome you to follow me for more match predictions. Lazio
      AH
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    • Northampton has shown a higher offensive efficiency in recent games. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 14.7%, significantly higher than Falkenberg's 8.9%. The expected goals per shot (xG per shot) for Northampton is 0.18, far better than their opponent's 0.11. In terms of passing, Northampton's key passing success rate reaches 76.3%, and their offensive passing value index is 3.2, much higher than Falkenberg's 62.1% and 2.1 respectively. They also have a strong midfield control, with an average ball possession rate of 58.4%. Moreover, they only take 4.2 seconds on average to transition from defense to offense, clearly imposing a rhythm on the game. Looking at the running data, Northampton has a total running distance of 112.4 kilometers and 147 high - intensity sprints throughout the game, leading their opponent by over 15%. Given these statistics, Northampton seems to have an edge in various aspects. But how will this game turn out? I invite you to follow my game predictions.
      AH
      SWE D2 IFK Norrkoping FK - Falkenberg
    • The recent form of the two teams shows a clear contrast. Kaliningrad Baltika has struggled in the attacking department. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rate was a mere 6.2%, and the expected goals per game (xG) were less than 0.8, indicating a significant lack of finishing ability in the front - line. On the other hand, Rubin Kazan holds an edge. They boast an offensive conversion rate of 12.7% and an average xG of 1.3 per game. Their key pass success rate is 8.3 percentage points higher, and the value density of their forward passes is 37% greater. In midfield control, Rubin Kazan has a 58% average possession rate, with a short - pass success rate of up to 91%. The frequency of their fast - break transitions is 42% higher. Looking at the running data, Rubin Kazan made 156 high - intensity sprints throughout the game, 51 more than their opponents. This shows they have a wider coverage area on the pitch and better physical distribution. So, how should we interpret
      O/U
      RUS PR Baltika Kaliningrad - Rubin Kazan
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.