Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> amvn>

    Al-Ahli SFC VS Auckland FC

    FIFA Intercontinental Cup
    Analysis More Tips
    Al-Ahli SFC
    Al-Ahli SFC
    Auckland FC
    Auckland FC
    I'm a well - established expert in football analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights for dedicated fans. In terms of offensive efficiency, Al Ittihad has shown greater prowess. Their overall offensive conversion rate stands at 28%, significantly better than Auckland FC's 19%. The expected goals (xG) value also reveals a clear edge, with Al Ittihad at 1.8 compared to Auckland FC's 0.9. When it comes to key passes, Al Ittihad's success rate is 62%, a 15 - percentage - point lead over their opponents. They also achieve 12.3 valuable forward passes per 90 minutes. In midfield control, Al Ittihad averages 11.2 tackles and 8.7 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds faster than Auckland FC. The team's physical performance is also remarkable. Al Ittihad covers a total running distance of 112.4 kilometers and has 43 high - intensity sprints, both figures exceeding Auckland FC's by over 15%.
    Further Reading
    • Ronakk Jain
      Ronakk Jain Won 3/4
      Jeddah National has been showing great strength at home recently. In the last Saudi League game, they thrashed Abha 4-0 at home. Although they had fewer corner - kicks (2 for the home team vs 4 for the away team), their attacking efficiency was extremely high. Statistics indicate that the team has achieved a record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss in their last 5 official games. They have won all their home games. The victory continued the positive momentum from their 3 - 1 away win over Damman Cooperation. In terms of offensive and defensive data, Jeddah National scores an average of 2.6 goals per home game, while conceding only 0.2 goals per game on the defensive end. They have only conceded 1 goal in their last 5 home games. Notably, after a narrow 1 - 2 away loss to Anwar SA, the team quickly adjusted their tactics. They bounced back strongly at home after a 0 - 1 away loss to Dirab. This shows their good tactical adaptability. The team has shown stability in friendly matches. They dr
      AH
      FIFA IC Al-Ahli SFC - Auckland FC
    • Declan ₿
      Declan ₿ Won 9/10
      The host team, Al-Ittihad, has seen excellent performance from their goalkeeper in defense recently. In the last three matches, the goalkeeper made 12 saves, with a save success rate of 86%. Among these, there were 3 crucial saves to defuse one-on-one situations, effectively ensuring the stability of the team's defense. On the other hand, the away team, Auckland City FC, takes a relatively large number of shots during away - game attacks, but their efficiency needs improvement. In the last four away games, they averaged 9 shots per game, yet the shooting accuracy was only 34%. In the last three matches, they took 27 shots but only scored 2 goals. The difference in the goalkeepers' performance and shooting efficiency between the two teams will determine the goal - conceding situation in the match.
      AH
      FIFA IC Al-Ahli SFC - Auckland FC
    • BET ENSURED
      BET ENSURED Won 4/4
      Description ​Al-Ahli Saudi FC 🇸🇦 host Auckland FC 🇳🇿 in the First Round (African-Asian-Pacific Cup Playoff) of the 2026 FIFA Intercontinental Cup on Wednesday, August 26, 2026. Kickoff is scheduled for 7:00 PM WAT (9:00 PM AST) at the King Abdullah Sports City Stadium in Jeddah. Operating under single-elimination tournament rules, the winner will advance to face CAF champions Mamelodi Sundowns in the next stage. ​
      AH
      FIFA IC Al-Ahli SFC - Auckland FC
    More Recommend
    • I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing high - quality information. This analysis is a long - term, top - notch product tailored for big players. In terms of offensive performance, Smoha has a better offensive conversion rate of 18.3%, compared to Petrem's 12.1%. The xG efficiency of Smoha is 0.78 while Petrem's is only 0.45. When it comes to passing, Smoha's key passing success rate stands at 62%, far ahead of Petrem's 49%. The value of forward passes for Smoha is 12.7, much higher than Petrem's 8.2. In the midfield battle, Smoha has a 61% ball - possession rate. Their transition speed is 1.8 times per minute, faster than Petrem's 0.9. As for the team's physical performance, Smoha's total running distance is 112.3 km, and they have 43 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing Petrem. Defensively, Smoha has 21 tackles, 15 interceptions, and 9 clearances, showing a comprehensive advantage. On the offensive end, Smoha's shots on targ
      AH
      EGY D1 Smouha SC - Asyut Petroleum
    • I'm a well - established expert in the field, offering long - term and high - quality analysis tailored for dedicated fans. In terms of offensive efficiency, Lokomotiv Tashkent has a significant edge. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks is 12% higher than that of Bunyodkor. The expected goals (xG) efficiency of Lokomotiv Tashkent is 1.85, notably superior to Bunyodkor's 1.22. When it comes to passing in the attacking third, Bunyodkor leads with a 78% passing value. However, Lokomotiv Tashkent shines in key passes, with a success rate of 43%, which is 21 percentage points higher than their opponents. In midfield control, Lokomotiv Tashkent shows its strength. They average 14 interceptions per game, and their transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster than Bunyodkor. Moreover, Lokomotiv Tashkent covers 1.2 kilometers more in running distance and has 24% more high - intensity sprints.
      O/U
      UZB D1 Lokomotiv Tashkent - Kuruvchi Bunyodkor
    • I've crafted a long - term high - quality product tailored for big players. Faisaly Harman shows clear superiority over Al - Khashm Al - Qirbah in multiple aspects. In terms of attack, Faisaly Harman has an 18.3% offensive conversion rate, better than the 14.1% of Al - Khashm Al - Qirbah. The xG efficiency is 0.78 compared to 0.52, which reflects Faisaly Harman's offensive edge. The key pass success rate of Faisaly Harman is 62%, while that of Al - Khashm Al - Qirbah is only 49%. The value of front - court passes is 12.7 for Faisaly Harman and 9.3 for the opponent. Faisaly Harman also controls the ball more, with a 58% possession rate compared to 42%. In terms of physical performance, Faisaly Harman runs 112 km, more than the 108 km of Al - Khashm Al - Qirbah. They have 56 high - intensity sprints compared to 43, indicating better physical reserves. Defensively, Al - Khashm Al - Qirbah does have some advantages. They have 12 tackles compared to 8, 9 interceptions compared to 5, and 6 c
      O/U
      SPL Al-Faisaly Harmah - Al-Fateh
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.