Qizilqum Zarafshon vs Nasaf Qarshi Tips and Predictions O/U Okiem Madridisty

Uzbek League

Analysis More Tips

Qizilqum Zarafshon

Nasaf Qarshi

Further Reading

Yαѕмιη

Kizilqum sits in 12th place, right on the edge of the relegation playoff zone. In recent years, significant changes in the starting lineup have taken a toll on the team's competitiveness. This season, their defensive line has been a major concern, conceding 31 goals in 28 league games, ranking among the worst in the league. Their recent form has also been lackluster, losing 3 out of the last 4 league games. With limited midfield coverage, their defense tends to falter in the later stages of the match due to fatigue, often leaving gaps in the backline. Nasaf, on the other hand, is currently in 7th place in the league table. As a traditional powerhouse in the league, under the guidance of Ruzikul Berdiyev, the team has a well - established tactical system, often using 3 - 4 - 3 or 5 - 3 - 2 formations flexibly. Their away performance has been relatively stable. This season, they've managed to draw against strong teams on the road. Their recent form has been on the upswing, and they hold

AH
UZB D1 Qizilqum Zarafshon - Nasaf Qarshi
Pi314

Kizilkum shows better offensive efficiency compared to Nasaf. Its offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, superior to Nasaf's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of 0.78 for Kizilkum also indicates a more productive performance than Nasaf's 0.59. In terms of passing, Kizilkum's key - pass success rate is 62%, leading Nasaf's 55%. The front - field passing value of 12.7 is more threatening than Nasaf's 9.3. Regarding midfield control, Kizilkum holds a 61% control rate while Nasaf only has 39%. The transition speed of Kizilkum is also faster, with an average of 12.8 seconds per turn compared to Nasaf's 15.2 seconds. In physical performance, Kizilkum runs 112.4 km in a game, 3.8 km more than Nasaf's 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 27 for Kizilkum and 19 for Nasaf, which shows Kizilkum has stronger physical fitness. I invite you to follow me and join the core team！ Kizilkum has shown greater activity in terms of steals, with 18 compared to Nasaf's 12. In midfield interception

O/U
UZB D1 Qizilqum Zarafshon - Nasaf Qarshi
Аrtur Silva

Kyzylkum is currently ranked 12th, hovering on the edge of the relegation playoff zone. In recent years, significant changes in the starting lineup have led to a decline in the team's competitiveness. This season, their defense has been a major issue, conceding 31 goals in 28 league games, making them one of the weaker defensive teams in the league. Their recent form has been lackluster, losing 3 out of the last 4 league games. Due to limited midfield coverage, their defense is prone to gaps in the latter stages of matches as players tire. Nasaf is positioned 7th in the league table. As a traditional powerhouse in the league, under the guidance of Ruzikul Berdiyev, the team has a relatively well - developed tactical system, often deploying 3 - 4 - 3 or 5 - 3 - 2 formations flexibly. Their away form is relatively solid. This season, they have drawn with strong teams on the road, and their recent form has been on the upswing. They hold a strong psychological edge over Kyzylkum. The team

AH
UZB D1 Qizilqum Zarafshon - Nasaf Qarshi

More Recommend

Tashkent Lokomotiv has a relatively lower offensive conversion rate this season, averaging only 9.3%, compared to Bunyodkor's 11.2%. However, both teams' xG efficiency, 1.42 for Tashkent Lokomotiv and 1.45 for Bunyodkor, fails to meet expectations. In terms of passing, Bunyodkor shows an edge. Its key - pass success rate stands at 72.4%, better than Tashkent Lokomotiv's 68.1%. The value of its forward - field passes, 0.38, also indicates a more efficient offensive organization compared to Tashkent Lokomotiv's 0.31. Tashkent Lokomotiv has a 54.7% midfield control rate and an average of 112 passes per game. But its transition - attack speed is relatively slow, at 1.8 seconds per transition. Both teams cover over 110 kilometers in running distance. However, Bunyodkor has a significant advantage in high - intensity sprints, with 193 sprints compared to Tashkent Lokomotiv's 167. In my view, providing careful analysis is the key to long - term success. In this Uzbekistan Super League encount

O/U
UZB D1 Lokomotiv Tashkent - Kuruvchi Bunyodkor
In this Uzbeksitan Super League encounter, we see a compelling match - up between two teams with distinct strengths. Let's first look at the offensive capabilities. Mash'al has an edge in offensive conversion. They have an average offensive end - conversion rate of 18.7% this season, ranking third in the league, while Namangan Ipak Yuli stands at 16.2%. In terms of xG efficiency, Mash'al's value is 1.15 (actual goals/expected goals), higher than Namangan Ipak Yuli's 1.08. When it comes to passing, Mash'al shows better performance. Their key - pass success rate is 72.4%, ranking second in the league, and the value of their forward - field passes is 0.89, meaning each pass creates 0.89 scoring opportunities. In contrast, Namangan Ipak Yuli's key - pass success rate is 68.1% and the forward - field pass value is 0.76. In terms of ball control and offensive transitions, Mash'al has an average ball - possession rate of 57.3% and 15.2 offensive transitions per game, ranking fourth in the lea

O/U
UZB D1 Mashal Muborak - Navbahor Namangan
Both Smouha and Petrojet have shown below - average offensive efficiency this season in the Egyptian Premier League. Smouha has an average offensive conversion rate of only 9.3%, while Petrojet's 10.1% conversion rate doesn't offer a significant edge. Their expected goals (xG) values are 1.21 and 1.08 respectively, both falling short of the league average. In terms of key pass success rates, Smouha has a front - field passing value of 0.32 times per 90 minutes, and Petrojet has 0.28 times per 90 minutes. Neither team meets the mid - league standard. In midfield control, the statistics are evenly matched. Smouha regains possession an average of 41 times per game, and Petrojet 43 times. However, both teams have low offensive conversion efficiencies, with the proportion of fast - break attacks below 18%. Regarding running statistics, Smouha's players make an average of 163 high - intensity sprints per game as a team, and Petrojet 157 times. Both teams rank in the lower half of the league.

O/U
EGY D1 Smouha SC - Asyut Petroleum

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Qizilqum Zarafshon VS Nasaf Qarshi