Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Vietnam VS Thailand

    ASEAN Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Vietnam
    Vietnam 0
    1 Thailand
    Thailand
    Further Reading
    • ましゅまろ
      ましゅまろ
      Vietnam has achieved quite good results recently. In contrast, Thailand's form has undergone some changes. Vietnam's performance has been lackluster overall with a significant decline. However, their recent showing is okay, indicating strong resilience. The Vietnamese team is good at engaging in protracted battles when facing other opponents. But they also have many flaws, and their overall performance has been less than ideal. Their away - game performance is particularly poor. This year, their results have been just average, with not many wins. Even at home, they can only manage to draw. Thailand, on the other hand, has better away - game results than home - game results. Both teams will go all out in this match. It's hard to predict which team will emerge victorious. This game is expected to be extremely exciting. To find out the comprehensive analysis of the possible outcome of this game, click for more details. The Vietnamese team has shown an improvement in recent form. Their off
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Vietnam 0-1 Thailand
    • Аrtur Silva
      Аrtur Silva
      Vietnam is likely to adopt a 3 - 5 - 2 formation in this match, aiming for effective counter - attacks. In the tactical arrangement, Nguyen Thanh Chung, Pham Xuan Meng, and Doan Van Hau will form the three - man defense line. Meanwhile, Nguyen Hoang Duc and Hai Long will control the rhythm in the midfield. Up front, the speed of Nguyen Dinh Bac and the holding - up play of Nguyen Xuan Son will be fully utilized. Vietnam can not only maintain the result but also look for opportunities to increase the score through counter - attacks on the road. On the other hand, Thailand has to go all out. They may use a 4 - 3 - 3 or 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 formation, or even deploy a double - striker setup for an all - out attack. However, facing Vietnam's solid defense, if Thailand fails to score quickly at the beginning, as the game progresses, the psychological defense of their players is likely to crumble. Vietnam's current balance between offense and defense gives them a significant edge. Since 2024, their
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Vietnam 0-1 Thailand
    • xuxusammi
      xuxusammi Won 12/19
      Vietnam's recent form has been impressive, demonstrating an efficient offensive and defensive system in the Southeast Asian Games. In their past five official games, they achieved three wins, one draw, and one loss. When playing at home, their attacking firepower is formidable. In home matches, they defeated Cambodia 3-1 with a 4-1 corner kick advantage and beat Malaysia 2-0 with an 11-7 corner kick lead. Their away performances are also solid. They defeated Thailand 2-0 away, outnumbering them 6-3 in corner kicks. They also thrashed Indonesia 3-0 away, creating a 3-2 corner kick edge, and beat Malaysia 2-0 away, taking the initiative with a 2-3 corner kick record. On average, they score 2.2 goals per game in the attacking end, and their defense is tight, conceding only 1 goal. In international friendlies, they won 4-0 at home against Myanmar with a 7-1 corner kick lead and won 2-1 away against Gangwon FC, even though the corner kicks were level at 0-0. Overall, their offensive and def
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Vietnam 0-1 Thailand
    More Recommend
    • Kizilkum shows better offensive efficiency compared to Nasaf. Its offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, superior to Nasaf's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of 0.78 for Kizilkum also indicates a more productive performance than Nasaf's 0.59. In terms of passing, Kizilkum's key - pass success rate is 62%, leading Nasaf's 55%. The front - field passing value of 12.7 is more threatening than Nasaf's 9.3. Regarding midfield control, Kizilkum holds a 61% control rate while Nasaf only has 39%. The transition speed of Kizilkum is also faster, with an average of 12.8 seconds per turn compared to Nasaf's 15.2 seconds. In physical performance, Kizilkum runs 112.4 km in a game, 3.8 km more than Nasaf's 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 27 for Kizilkum and 19 for Nasaf, which shows Kizilkum has stronger physical fitness. I invite you to follow me and join the core team! Kizilkum has shown greater activity in terms of steals, with 18 compared to Nasaf's 12. In midfield interception
      O/U
      UZB D1 Qizilqum Zarafshon - Nasaf Qarshi
    • Vienna Rapid holds several advantages over Heart of Midlothian. In terms of offensive conversion, Vienna Rapid has an 18% conversion rate, better than Heart of Midlothian's 12%. The xG efficiency of 0.92 to 0.65 also reflects Vienna Rapid's offensive superiority. The key pass success rate shows that Vienna Rapid is more efficient, with 65% compared to 58% of Heart of Midlothian. The passing value in the front - field, 12.3 to 9.7, highlights Vienna Rapid's better ball - control quality. In the midfield, Vienna Rapid has more interceptions, 14 times compared to 8, and the tackle success rate is 72% against 55%, indicating stronger control. The total running distance of Vienna Rapid is 112km while Heart of Midlothian's is 1.4km, and the high - intensity sprints are 42 times versus 28 times, showing better physical reserves. However, Heart of Midlothian has a more resilient defense. They have more clearances, 18 times to 12, and more interceptions, 11 to 7. But their tackle success rate o
      AH
      UEFA ECL Rapid Wien - Heart of Midlothian
    • In this match, let's take a look at the key stats of both teams. In terms of offensive conversion, Jeddah Club has an 18.3% conversion rate, which is better than Auckland FC's 12.7%. However, Auckland FC has an xG efficiency of 0.78, higher than Jeddah Club's 0.62. Regarding passing data, Jeddah Club leads with a 61% successful key - pass rate compared to Auckland's 49%. The value of forward passes is 1.23 for Jeddah Club and 0.89 for Auckland FC. In midfield control, Jeddah Club has an average of 14.2 tackles per game and a transition speed of 1.8 seconds, faster than Auckland's 2.4 seconds. In terms of running distances, Jeddah Club covers 112.3 km, slightly more than Auckland's 109.8 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 for Jeddah Club and 19 for Auckland FC. On the defensive end, Jeddah Club makes 18 interceptions and 11 clearances, while Auckland FC has 12 tackles and 7 clearances. For offensive efficiency, Jeddah Club's scoring - chance conversion rate is 22%, higher
      O/U
      FIFA IC Al-Ahli SFC - Auckland FC
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.