Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Logan Winchester
1.4K
Articles
1
Like
14
Follower
65.9%
Win Rate
+10.7%
ROI
43
Tips
1.91
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
YomiAICryptoWon 8/8Follow100%Win Rate +76.9%ROI 10Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
1
TipMastersWon 9/9Follow100%Win Rate +55.3%ROI 10Tips 1.65Avg Odds -
3
OssOssOssWon 6/6Follow86.4%Win Rate +50.1%ROI 22Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
MESSI CLUTCHWon 10/12Follow83.3%Win Rate +53.8%ROI 12Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
5
NajibbbbbxcFollow82.4%Win Rate +44.3%ROI 20Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
Barbar08Follow81.8%Win Rate +54.8%ROI 12Tips 1.91Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
p90xViking has shown relatively stable performance at home this season. With an average of 2.0 goals scored and 2.0 goals conceded per game, their offensive and defensive statistics are well - balanced. Specifically, at home, they've scored 4 goals and conceded 2, resulting in a goal difference of 2. Their defense has shown some resilience. However, their overall win rate is only 50% and the draw rate is 30%, indicating high volatility in match results. On the other hand, Dinamo Zagreb has demonstrated strong overall strength. They have a high win rate of 60% and no losses. Their offensive and defensive efficiency is at a high level, with an average of 2.5 goals scored and only 1.4 goals conceded per game. When playing away, they score an average of 1.5 goals and concede 2.0, with a goal difference of 1.0, which means they can also perform steadily on the road. The difference in offensive efficiency between Viking's home games (2.0 goals per game) and Dinamo Zagreb's away games (1.5 goalsAH
UEFA CL
Viking
3-1 Dinamo Zagreb
-
Messi Stan extraaaThe rematch between Viking and Dinamo Zagreb in the UEFA Champions League has drawn significant attention. In their previous encounter, the two teams played to a 2 - 2 draw. In that game, Dinamo Zagreb dominated at home with 9 corner kicks compared to Viking's 3. This clearly shows the home team's control in possession and dominance in the flanks. The 2 - 2 score at half - time indicates the intense back - and - forth in both teams' offense and defense. The corner - kick statistics further reveal that Dinamo Zagreb created threats through frequent crosses from the flanks. Although Viking had fewer corner kicks, their defense showed resilience and successfully defused many of the home team's corner - kick attacks. From a tactical perspective, Dinamo Zagreb's high - pressing and flank - attack system is their key tactical feature. Viking, on the other hand, needs to improve their coordinated defense in the corner - kick areas. They should avoid repeating the mistakes from the previous gaAHUEFA CL
Viking
3-1 Dinamo Zagreb
-
Janan💚Viking, a traditional strong team in the Norwegian Premier League, has shown excellent form at home this season, winning all 7 home games, scoring 25 goals and conceding only 8. This indicates their strong dominance in both attack and defense. In the first leg of the Champions League play - offs, Viking faced the Croatian First Division powerhouse Dinamo Zagreb. Despite trailing 0 - 2 away, they managed to equalize with two goals, demonstrating their tenacity and ability to stage comebacks. The first - leg ended in a 2 - 2 draw. Now, in this second leg, the winner will directly qualify for the Champions League group stage. For Viking, playing at home, a win would mean a historical first qualification for the Champions League group stage. This has undoubtedly fueled the team's motivation to an unprecedented level. With their outstanding home record and the ability to turn the tables shown in the first leg, Viking will be eager to secure a victory and write a new chapter in their club hiAHUEFA CL
Viking
3-1 Dinamo Zagreb
UEFA CL
More Recommend
-
Cluj has shown a solid performance at home in this season's Romanian League. Their home record stands at 5 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses, boasting a 50% win - rate. They average 1.66 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per home game. The goal ratio is 10:8, with a goal difference of +2, which highlights a balanced home - field offense and defense. Specific data reveals that Cluj has netted 10 goals at home while conceding only 8. Their average number of corners per home game is 5.5, and they receive 1.2 yellow cards per game, indicating good offensive efficiency and discipline. On the other hand, Universitatea Cluj has a dismal away - game record. They have 0 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses on the road, resulting in a 0% win - rate. They average just 0.5 goals scored and 2.5 goals conceded per away game. The goal ratio is 2:5, with a goal difference of - 3. A comparison shows that Universitatea Cluj's away - game goals (2) are only one - fifth of Cluj's home - game goals, while their away -AH
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post