Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Subechi Milanisti
376
Articles
0
Like
1
Follower
52.9%
Win Rate
+2.6%
ROI
35
Tips
1.93
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Igodo oyounvieWon 4/4Follow90%Win Rate +40.3%ROI 20Tips 1.60Avg Odds -
2
CatatanAli7Won 9/10Follow90%Win Rate +71.8%ROI 11Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
3
OssOssOssWon 6/6Follow88.9%Win Rate +52.1%ROI 18Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
rewat.32@OfficiaFollow88.9%Win Rate +64.1%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
5
GARAGARABOLAFollow87.5%Win Rate +50%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
JFollow86.7%Win Rate +50.4%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
SUNYANI MAYOR🦉🎶Chelsea has a relatively short recent schedule, which poses a challenge to their physical fitness reserves. The team plays in a pragmatic style, relying on the midfield to set up layers of defensive positions and organize attacks. Their offensive and defensive transition rhythm is quite slow, and they mainly focus on maintaining a solid defensive base. On the other hand, Luton has a strong squad depth, allowing for sufficient rotation. Their playing style is more flexible. They are good at using the speed of their players to make runs and inter - change positions, which can disrupt the opponent's defensive layout. Both teams have had wins and losses recently, and Luton is full of fighting spirit. With Chelsea's steady tactics and Luton's flexible approach, the rhythm of this confrontation is definitely worth paying attention to. Chelsea enters this EFL Cup encounter with a well - structured tactical approach. Their midfield is solid in terms of positioning and ball - passing in set - pAH
ENG LC
Chelsea
2-0 Luton Town
-
Tropical IslandChelsea's dominance is evident from historical head - to - head data against Luton. In four encounters, Chelsea won every single game. Looking at the scores, Chelsea triumphed with results of 3 - 1, 2 - 3, 3 - 0, and 2 - 3. In terms of corner kicks, Chelsea had the upper hand in all four matches. The corner - kick statistics were 7 - 2, 3 - 8, 6 - 4, and 7 - 3. On average, Chelsea got 5.5 corner kicks per game, while Luton only managed 3.5. Chelsea also showed better performance when leading at half - time. In one game, they led 1 - 0 at half - time and went on to win 3 - 0. In another, they were up 2 - 1 at half - time and secured a 3 - 1 victory. Meanwhile, Luton once led 2 - 1 at half - time but failed to hold on to the lead. Overall, Chelsea's past record against Luton indicates a strong advantage in both full - time results, corner - kick opportunities, and half - time situations. Chelsea has shown more efficient offensive organization from a tactical perspective. In a previous maO/UENG LC
Chelsea
2-0 Luton Town
-
Stef Olivier KChelsea's recent performance in friendly matches has shown significant fluctuations in both offense and defense. In a home game, they defeated Real Sociedad 3-1. Although they were tied 1-1 at halftime, a 5-2 corner kick statistic indicated their dominance in ball - possession. Against AC Milan on a neutral ground, they won 3-0 with a 1-0 lead at halftime and a 7-2 corner kick advantage, highlighting their offensive firepower. However, there were also concerning results. In an away game against Juventus, they lost 0-1 with a 5-1 corner kick count. And when they faced Tottenham Hotspur away, they were defeated 1-2 with equal corner kicks (1-1), suggesting potential issues in their defense. Overall, Chelsea has been efficient in attack during friendly matches, but they need to improve defensive stability. On the other hand, Luton, a League One team, has a worrying record in the EFL Cup. In an away game against Gillingham, they lost 0-3, trailing 0-1 at halftime. The huge disparity in corO/UENG LC
Chelsea
2-0 Luton Town
ENG LC
More Recommend
-
Cluj-Napoca has shown a significant difference in offensive and defensive efficiency this season in the Romanian Liga I. Based on the data from 10 matches, the team has 3 wins, 3 draws, and 4 losses. They average 1.4 goals scored and 1.5 goals conceded per game, resulting in a negative goal difference of -1. The team's average of 5.5 corner kicks per game indicates that their ball - control and offensive organization abilities are at a mid - level in the league. However, the average of 1.2 yellow cards per game in defense reveals the instability of their backline under high - pressure situations. On the other hand, Universitatea Cluj is facing a more severe offensive dilemma. In 10 matches, they have only scored 8 goals, with an average of 0.8 goals per game, which is at the bottom of the league. Meanwhile, they have conceded as many as 15 goals, with an average of 1.5 goals conceded per game, showing obvious defensive loopholes. The team's disciplinary issues, with an average of 2.1 yO/U
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post