Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Akron Togliatti VS CSKA Moscow

    Russia Premier League
    Analysis More Tips
    Akron Togliatti
    Akron Togliatti
    CSKA Moscow
    CSKA Moscow
    Further Reading
    • XabiAlonso222
      XabiAlonso222
      Akron finished 9th in the 2024/25 RPL before slipping to 13th in 2025/26, while CSKA finished 3rd and 5th respectively. After five rounds this season, Akron have only 2 points in 15th, while CSKA sit 3rd with 11 points before kickoff. Akron’s last five matches across competitions brought a 1-0 win over CSKA in the Russian Cup, a 3-3 draw with Rodina, a 0-0 draw with Lokomotiv, then 0-4 and 0-3 defeats to Rostov and Krylya Sovetov. Eleven goals conceded in three defeats expose defensive weakness. CSKA’s recent sequence is more balanced: a 3-2 win over Lokomotiv, a 0-1 Cup defeat to Akron, a 1-0 win against Fakel, a 0-0 draw with Rostov and a 1-1 draw with Krylya Sovetov. Their control and game management remain stronger. The head-to-head record still strongly favors CSKA, with six wins, one draw and one defeat in the last eight meetings. Akron’s recent victory in Moscow provides confidence, but it does not erase the longer-term gap in overall results. The market also places CSKA c
      O/U
      RUS PR Akron Togliatti - CSKA Moscow
    • Arnaldo Montaner
      Arnaldo Montaner
      The significant improvement in Akron-Togliatti's recent performance can be attributed to the outstanding play of their defense. This has not only enhanced the team's overall strength but also increased their stability. On the other hand, CSKA Moscow has also been in good form. The key to their improvement is also the excellent performance of their defense. However, there are differences between the two teams. CSKA Moscow's forwards are relatively weak, which poses a certain risk. The number of goals conceded also reflects the gap in strength between the two teams. Their performance in both attack and defense is similar whether playing at home or away. CSKA Moscow's performance is also commendable. Even when trailing at half - time, they played at a steady pace. But on the flip side, it shows their lack of experience. In their past three games, they lost two, which has greatly reduced their fighting ability. Looking at the historical record, CSKA Moscow has an edge. In their previous en
      O/U
      RUS PR Akron Togliatti - CSKA Moscow
    • Ekaya
      Ekaya
      Akron-Togliatti has had a dismal performance at home this season. Their home win rate stands at a mere 14.2%, with a draw rate of 14.2% and a staggering loss rate of 71.4%. They have a home record of 1 win, 1 draw, and 8 losses. On average, they score only 0.57 goals per game and have conceded 17 goals, indicating significant defensive vulnerabilities. In terms of their overall record, their win rate is 20%, draw rate 30%, and loss rate 50%. They average 0.8 goals per game and concede 1.6 goals, resulting in a negative goal difference of -12. Their offensive and defensive efficiency is far below the league average. In home games, they average 3.8 corner kicks and 1.2 yellow cards per game. Their tactical system seems rather conservative but with low conversion rates, making it difficult for their offense to break through the opponent's defense. On the other hand, CSKA Moscow has a relatively stable away - game state. Their away win rate is 33.3%, with no draws and a loss rate of 66.6%.
      O/U
      RUS PR Akron Togliatti - CSKA Moscow
    More Recommend
    • Gorohivka shows several advantages over Obolon in this game. In terms of offense, Gorohivka has a better conversion rate. Its offensive conversion rate is 18.3%, which is superior to Obolon's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of 1.21 compared to 0.89 also reflects Gorohivka's offensive efficiency advantage. Moreover, Gorohivka's key pass success rate is 62%, leading Obolon's 49%. The value of its front - court passes is 1.78, higher than Obolon's 1.32, indicating stronger control in the middle of the field. In terms of physical fitness, the average running distance of Gorohivka players is 11.2 km, and they have 43 high - intensity sprints, 12 more than Obolon, suggesting better physical reserves. On the defensive end, Gorohivka has 14 tackles, 21 interceptions, and 9 clearances. The interception data is 35% higher than that of Obolon. I invite you to follow me to stay updated on more in - depth game analyses. Obolon has been struggling with a low offensive conversion rate, squandering scoring o
      O/U
      UKR D1 Kolos Kovalyovka - Obolon Kiev
    • The offensive finishing conversion rate of Dungun is 18.6%, which is higher than Selangor's 14.2%. The xG efficiency stands at 1.24 for Dungun and 0.91 for Selangor. In terms of key passing success rate, Dungun has a 62% rate compared to Selangor's 55%. The value of forward passes is 13.7 for Dungun and 11.2 for Selangor. Regarding midfield interceptions, Dungun has 12 while Selangor has 9. Dungun also controls the ball 58% of the time, leaving Selangor with only 42%. In terms of physical performance, Dungun's total running distance is 112 km, more than Selangor's 108 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 45 for Dungun and 38 for Selangor. Overall, Dungun shows better offensive and midfield performance in multiple aspects, which may give them an edge in the game. Dungun has shown better defensive performance. They had 15 tackles compared to Selangor's 11, 18 interceptions against Selangor's 14, and 9 clearances while Selangor only had 6. In terms of attack, Dungun's conversion
      O/U
      MAS SL Terengganu - Selangor
    • Brunswick shows better performance in multiple aspects compared to Berlin Herta. Brunswick's overall offensive conversion rate is 28%, superior to Berlin Herta's 19%. The xG efficiency stands at 0.78 for Brunswick and 0.42 for Berlin Herta. The success rate of key passes is 63% for Brunswick, leading Berlin Herta's 55%. The value of front - field passes is higher for Brunswick, 12.4 compared to 9.1. In midfield, Brunswick has a control rate of 58%, suppressing Berlin Herta's 42%. In terms of physical performance, Brunswick runs 112 km, 3 km more than Berlin Herta. They also have more high - intensity sprints (14 times vs 9 times). Defensively, Brunswick's data is comprehensively better, with 18 tackles compared to Berlin Herta's 12, and 7 clearances against Berlin Herta's 4. On the other hand, Berlin Herta relies on wing crosses in the offensive end, but their conversion efficiency is low. An xG value of less than 0.5 indicates the poor quality of their goal - scoring opportunities. I
      AH
      GER D2 Eintracht Braunschweig - Hertha Berlin
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.