Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍>

    Groningen VS Fortuna Sittard

    Holland Eredivisie
    Analysis More Tips
    Groningen
    Groningen 2
    3 Fortuna Sittard
    Fortuna Sittard
    Further Reading
    • Аrtur Silva
      Аrtur Silva
      The home team, Groningen, is currently in 5th place in the new season. They've had a decent start with 2 wins and 1 loss in the first 3 rounds, scoring 7 goals. Their attack has been quite active, especially with Icelandic striker Vilhjálmsson in great form. He's scored in each of the 3 rounds and leads the league's goal - scoring chart. However, Groningen has some defensive issues. In their last away game, they suffered a heavy 1 - 5 defeat to PSV Eindhoven, which showed their lack of ability to handle pressure against strong opponents. Currently, their defense is mostly made up of substitutes, resulting in a low margin of error in positional defense. On the other hand, Fortuna Sittard, the away team, is in 8th place. They've got 1 win, 1 draw, and 1 loss in the first 3 rounds, with 5 goals scored and 5 conceded. They once held the defending champions to a 2 - 2 draw away from home, demonstrating their resilience. But for this match, Fortuna Sittard is facing a serious personnel cris
      O/U
      HOL D1 Groningen 2-3 Fortuna Sittard
    • ต.เต้ย 🍀
      ต.เต้ย 🍀 Won 3/5
      Groeningen has been facing a tough challenge at home in the Eredivisie. This season, their home win - rate is only 40%, while the loss rate is as high as 50%. Their defensive record of conceding 1.9 goals per game is a major concern. Among the 19 goals they've conceded at home, there were several fatal mistakes in key games, showing a serious lack of defensive stability. On the other hand, Fortuna Sittard's away - games have been even more arduous. Their away win - rate is 0%, and they only manage to score 1.0 goal per game on average, indicating extremely low offensive efficiency. In their 3 away games, they've only scored 3 goals but conceded 7, creating a vicious cycle of weak offense and porous defense. When comparing the offensive and defensive efficiency of the two teams, Groeningen scores 1.3 goals per game at home, slightly lower than Fortuna Sittard's 1.5 goals per game on the road. However, the difference in defense is more striking. Groeningen concedes 1.9 goals at home, whi
      AH
      HOL D1 Groningen 2-3 Fortuna Sittard
    • EvilSpirit
      EvilSpirit
      Groningen's recent performances in the Eredivisie have shown a significant disparity between home and away games. At home, Groningen demonstrated strong control. In one match, they defeated Utrecht 2-1. They led 1-0 at halftime and had a 5-1 advantage in corner kicks, which clearly showed their ability to dominate games at their home ground. In a friendly, they also won 3-2 against Emmen, with a 5-5 corner kick count, indicating good tactical execution. Statistically, they average 1.67 goals per home game. On the road, however, Groningen's performance has been far from satisfactory. They suffered a 0-5 thrashing at the hands of PSV Eindhoven. They were 3-1 down at halftime and were out - cornered 9-4, revealing their defensive frailties. Even in the friendly, they lost 0-4 to FC Volendam, despite having an equal number of corner kicks (6-6), which highlighted their lack of offensive firepower. In the Eredivisie, they average 3.33 goals conceded per away game. In a remarkable comeback,
      O/U
      HOL D1 Groningen 2-3 Fortuna Sittard
    More Recommend
    • Chicago Fire shows a clear edge over Seattle Sounders when it comes to offensive efficiency. The offensive conversion rate of Chicago is 22%, while that of Seattle is only 18%. In terms of xG efficiency, Chicago's 1.2 outperforms Seattle's 0.9, indicating a more effective finishing ability. When analyzing passing efficiency, Chicago also takes the lead. The success rate of key passes in Chicago reaches 85%, higher than Seattle's 80%. This suggests that Chicago's passes in the front - court are more valuable and can create more substantial threats. In the midfield control aspect, Chicago holds a 58% possession rate and has a rapid transition speed (an average of 8 seconds). These factors enable them to effectively dominate the game rhythm. Looking at the running data, Chicago has an advantage in both the total running distance of 140km (compared to Seattle's 110km) and the number of high - intensity sprints. This indicates that Chicago has a better physical reserve, which is crucial for
      AH
      MLS Seattle Sounders - Chicago Fire
    • New York City FC shows better offensive firepower compared to Toronto FC. Toronto FC has an offensive conversion rate of 15.8% and an xG efficiency of 0.92, while New York City FC boasts 21.4% and 1.12 respectively. In terms of passing efficiency, New York City FC also stands out. Their key pass success rate is 73.4%, and the front - court passing value index is 8.4, indicating a strong ability to create threats. When it comes to winning scenarios, New York City FC's midfield has a ball - possession rate of 57.2%. They can complete a counter - attack in an average of 8.4 seconds, showing high - efficiency in offensive transitions. In terms of physical fitness, the whole New York City FC team runs 118 km and has 152 high - intensity sprints, suggesting they have an edge in physical reserves. Overall, New York City FC seems to have more advantages in this match. New York City's defense has been quite active, registering 14 tackles, 10 interceptions, and 28 clearances. However, their high
      O/U
      MLS Toronto FC - New York City FC
    • Philadelphia Union is in a strong position in this MLS encounter. In terms of offensive efficiency, they lead the way. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 15%, while New York Red Bulls only manage 10%. The xG efficiency also shows an edge for Philadelphia, with a 1.2 compared to New York's 0.8. When it comes to passing, Philadelphia Union has a key passing success rate of 85%, significantly higher than New York's 74%. Their forward - passing value is 0.8, giving them a clear advantage. In midfield control, Philadelphia holds a 58% possession rate and can achieve a quick transition in 3.4 seconds, putting pressure on their opponents. In high - intensity running, Philadelphia's total distance of 1.4 km and 240 sprints far exceed New York's statistics. All these factors suggest that Philadelphia Union has a good chance of performing well in this game. Philadelphia Union has been showing a dominant form in recent games. In terms of defense, the team has been extremely solid. They've
      AH
      MLS New York Red Bulls - Philadelphia Union
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.