Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Tesni¹ˢᵗ11Follow88.9%Win Rate +60.4%ROI 10Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
Grey🎧 big speakers 🌍💸Follow83.3%Win Rate +54.4%ROI 14Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
AI Soccer PredictorWon 5/6Follow83.3%Win Rate +57.5%ROI 11Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
4
OssOssOssWon 10/12Follow81.3%Win Rate +42.7%ROI 16Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
IqtidarFollow81%Win Rate +39.4%ROI 48Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
6
YαѕмιηFollow80%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 26Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Eldy FebriansyahThe historical encounters between Atlanta United and Charlotte FC reveal distinct home - field advantages and tactical characteristics. In the past five home games, Atlanta United has a record of 1 win, 3 losses, and 1 draw. However, they've been consistently strong in corner - kick statistics. The average number of home corner kicks for Atlanta United is 7.2, while Charlotte FC only averages 3.8 corner kicks on the road. In previous matches, like the 11 - 5 corner - kick dominance at home and the 6 - 3 suppression, it clearly shows the home team's ability to create set - piece opportunities through wing attacks. Charlotte FC has shown significant fluctuations in their recent away - game form. In the last six away games, they have 1 win, 1 loss, and 4 draws. Their low goal - scoring efficiency on the road is evident, with an average of only 0.83 goals per game. After a 2 - 0 victory away, they've only managed 1 draw and 2 losses in the last three away games, indicating a slow tempo inAH
MLS
Atlanta United
0-1
Charlotte FC
-
CryptoDudeAtlanta United has had a mixed record recently, winning 3, drawing 2, and losing 5 in their last 10 games. They've recently brought in a new foreign player, which could potentially boost their performance. However, their form has been inconsistent, suggesting this will be a tough battle. On the other hand, Charlotte FC has been in better form, with 6 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses in their last 10 matches. Despite some recent fluctuations, they've been scoring a lot of goals and have a solid defense. But they still lack the ability to consistently secure points. Looking at the historical head - to - head data, Atlanta United has been at a disadvantage in the last 10 meetings. This doesn't align with their current offensive and defensive performances. Atlanta United has shown good potential in recent games. They've been playing quite well and are capable of putting up a strong fight. It's hard to predict which team will seize the initiative in this game. It's sure to be an exciting encountO/UMLS
Atlanta United
0-1
Charlotte FC
-
AlioskibrownAtlanta United has been in great offensive form recently. They've been scoring goals consistently in each game, showing a high - powered attack. In terms of their head - to - head record against Charlotte FC, the two teams have had a fairly even performance in recent meetings. However, Atlanta United holds a clear edge over the long - run. They've dominated their opponents in previous encounters, putting significant pressure on Charlotte FC during those games. Looking at Charlotte FC, they're still dealing with an incomplete lineup. Despite this, they've been in hot form during their recent away trips. Based on the current data, the gap between the two teams isn't substantial. Also, considering their past meetings in the last three seasons, there have always been plenty of goals. It remains to be seen which team can seize the initiative in this game. Will Atlanta United continue their dominance with their strong offensive play? Or will Charlotte FC, with their good away form, manage toAHMLS
Atlanta United
0-1
Charlotte FC
MLS
More Recommend
-
I've been meticulously studying football matches and making top - notch selections. Nashville SC has shown an edge over Cincinnati in various aspects. In terms of offensive performance, Nashville SC's offensive finishing conversion rate stands at 18.7%, which is better than Cincinnati's 15.2%. The xG efficiency of 1.23 for Nashville SC compared to 0.98 for Cincinnati also reflects its offensive superiority. Nashville SC's key pass success rate is 62%, leading Cincinnati's 55%. The value of its forward - field passes is 1.83, much higher than Cincinnati's 0.96. In the midfield, Nashville SC controls the ball 61% of the time, clearly dominating the game, while Cincinnati has only a 39% possession. Moreover, Nashville SC's transition speed is 12.3 seconds, faster than Cincinnati's 15.7 seconds. In terms of physical exertion, Nashville SC's total team average running distance is 112.4 km, with 43 high - intensity sprints. These figures surpass Cincinnati's 108.6 km and 35 sprints. On the dAHMLS
Nashville SC
-
FC Cincinnati
-
I've been meticulously studying football matches and here's my in - depth analysis of this MLS game. The Portland Timbers have shown a higher efficiency in their offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, significantly surpassing Austin FC's 12.7%. The xG efficiency value of 1.32 for the Timbers compared to Austin FC's 0.89 clearly indicates their more effective goal - scoring ability. In terms of passing statistics, the home team, the Portland Timbers, has a key - passing success rate of 61%, leading Austin FC's 45%. With a forward - field passing value of 12.7 times per 90 minutes, they demonstrate a strong ball - control advantage. The midfield control rate shows a huge gap, with the Timbers having a 68% control rate while Austin FC only has 42%. Moreover, the Timbers' average transition speed of 1.8 seconds per play is faster than Austin FC's 2.4 seconds, enabling them to effectively connect their offense and defense. The entire Portland Timbers team has a totaAHMLS
Portland Timbers
-
Austin FC
-
I specialize in match analysis and offer top - notch selections. In this Romanian League encounter, Cluj shows a significant edge over Universitatea Cluj. Offensively, Cluj's conversion rate at the final third is 12% higher than its opponent. The xG value stands at 1.8 compared to 0.9. With a key passing success rate of 78%, it leads the league. The value of forward passes is 12.3 against 8.6. Defensively, Cluj has 15 midfield interceptions compared to 9 of its rival. It also covers 2.1 kilometers more in high - intensity sprints. With 12 tackles and 8 interceptions, its defensive statistics are comprehensively superior. The total running distance of Cluj is 112.4 kilometers, ahead of 108.6 kilometers of the opponent, indicating better physical reserves. In the back - field, Cluj has 7 clearances, suppressing the opponent's 4, which shows stronger defensive stability. Moreover, Cluj's shot - on - target rate is 45%, far exceeding the away team's 28%. The conversion rate of scoring oppoAH
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post