Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Tesni¹ˢᵗ11Follow88.9%Win Rate +60.4%ROI 10Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
Grey🎧 big speakers 🌍💸Follow83.3%Win Rate +54.4%ROI 14Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
AI Soccer PredictorWon 5/6Follow83.3%Win Rate +57.5%ROI 11Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
4
OssOssOssWon 10/12Follow81.3%Win Rate +42.7%ROI 16Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
IqtidarFollow81%Win Rate +39.4%ROI 48Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
6
YαѕмιηFollow80%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 26Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
The Chelsea VerdictSeattle Sounders are in a strong position against Chicago Fire. In the offensive aspect, Seattle Sounders have a 12% higher conversion rate in finishing attacks compared to their opponents. Their xG value of 1.8 is superior to Chicago's 1.2. With a key - pass success rate of 72% against Chicago's 65%, they demonstrate better organizational ability in attack. Their forward - field passing value leads by 15%. In midfield control, Seattle Sounders hold a 68% control rate, suppressing their opponents. They can achieve 2.3 effective attacks per minute in transition. The whole team runs an average of 11.2 km, with 24 more high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. On the defensive end, Seattle Sounders have 18 tackles, 33% more than Chicago's 12. Their interception efficiency is 20% higher, and they are also more efficient in clearing the ball. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. Set up the push notifications to stay updated. SeaAH
MLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
-
LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍Chicago Fire shows a clear edge over Seattle Sounders when it comes to offensive efficiency. The offensive conversion rate of Chicago is 22%, while that of Seattle is only 18%. In terms of xG efficiency, Chicago's 1.2 outperforms Seattle's 0.9, indicating a more effective finishing ability. When analyzing passing efficiency, Chicago also takes the lead. The success rate of key passes in Chicago reaches 85%, higher than Seattle's 80%. This suggests that Chicago's passes in the front - court are more valuable and can create more substantial threats. In the midfield control aspect, Chicago holds a 58% possession rate and has a rapid transition speed (an average of 8 seconds). These factors enable them to effectively dominate the game rhythm. Looking at the running data, Chicago has an advantage in both the total running distance of 140km (compared to Seattle's 110km) and the number of high - intensity sprints. This indicates that Chicago has a better physical reserve, which is crucial forAHMLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
-
MESSI CLUTCH Won 5/6Seattle Sounders have shown solid form at home this season. In their last five home games, they've achieved three wins, one draw, and one loss, scoring 1.8 goals per game on average. Their offensive efficiency ranks among the top five in the league. At home, the team boasts a high possession rate of 58%, creating threats through short - passing plays. However, the absence of the starting center - back due to injury has affected the stability of their defense. On the other hand, Chicago Fire has relatively good away - game capabilities. But this season, they've conceded an average of 2.4 goals per game on the road, and in their last five away games, they've conceded a total of 12 goals, which shows significant defensive weaknesses. Notably, Chicago's front line has recently regained form. They've scored 5 goals in the last three games. The new - signing forward has contributed 3 goals in the last two away games, and the counter - attack efficiency has increased to 5.2 fast - breaks perO/UMLS
Seattle Sounders
2-2 Chicago Fire
MLS
More Recommend
-
The Chicago Fire is currently third in the Eastern Conference of the MLS this season. Their home form has been particularly impressive. In 8 home games, they've achieved 5 wins, 0 draws, and 3 losses, scoring 16 goals while conceding only 9, with a goal difference of +7 and a win - rate of 62.5%. In their last six matches, the team has maintained a strong performance, winning 4 and losing 2, scoring 15 goals and conceding 8, also with a goal difference of +7. Their offensive efficiency has notably improved. On the other hand, the Vancouver Whitecaps, leading the Western Conference, have an outstanding record of 10 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses in 14 league games. They've scored 34 goals and conceded just 12, resulting in a remarkable goal difference of +22, which shows their dominance in both attack and defense. In away games, they've won 3, drawn 2, and lost 1 in 6 matches, scoring 13 goals and conceding 8, with a win - rate of 50%. Their defensive stability is praiseworthy. When comparAHMLS
Chicago Fire
-
Vancouver Whitecaps
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post