Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍>

    Atalanta VS Bologna

    Italy Serie A
    Analysis More Tips
    Atalanta
    Atalanta
    Bologna
    Bologna
    Further Reading
    • Okiem Madridisty
      Okiem Madridisty
      Atlanta's recent offensive performance has been lackluster. In their past five matches, their average offensive conversion rate was only 9.3%, significantly lower than the 14.2% average of the top six teams in the league. On the other hand, Bologna's key passing success rate is 72.1%, ranking fourth from the bottom in Serie A. Their passing value in the front - field (PA.V) of 0.38 times per 90 minutes indicates a weak offensive organization. Atlanta has also seen a notable decline in midfield control. Their short - passing success rate is 81%, which is 4.2 percentage points lower than at the beginning of the season. Bologna, with a counter - attack conversion speed of 1.35 times per minute (ranked 18th in the league), struggles with the connection between offense and defense. Both teams show signs of fatigue in high - intensity running. Atlanta's average sprint distance of 89 km/h and Bologna's 78 km/h suggest that the intensity of their confrontation may not be enough to create conti
      O/U
      ITA D1 Atalanta - Bologna
    • Alpha Crypto Ads 💎🚀
      Alpha Crypto Ads 💎🚀
      Atlanta had a strong performance last season, finishing among the top teams in Serie A. Their overall attacking power was exceptional in the league, with a consistently high goal - scoring efficiency. Their tactical style was highly aggressive. They had a well - developed high - pressing and all - out attacking strategy, and the speed of their attack - defense transitions was extremely fast, which enabled them to perform well in tough games. The team's home form was very strong, and their attacking firepower at home was even more ferocious. There were multiple goal - scoring threats in the front - line. Their offensive means were diverse, including flanking attacks, central penetration, and long - range shots, allowing them to break through various defensive systems effectively. In the new season, the team has an intact lineup with all the key players available. The forward, Scamacca, is reliable in front of the goal and has excellent ability to hold up the ball and create opportunitie
      AH
      ITA D1 Atalanta - Bologna
    • Wellness wins
      Wellness wins
      Atlanta has been in good form recently. In their last 10 games, they've won 6, drawn 2, and lost 2. Bologna's performance is also decent, with 4 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses in the same period. Bologna shows a well - distributed attacking pattern. Atlanta, on the other hand, has been quite stable in recent matches. Looking at their head - to - head record, Atlanta has a clear advantage. For this game, Atlanta might use substitute or second - tier players to let the main players rest, or to test the team's lineup and tactics. The team has managed to stay undefeated in several consecutive games, and the number of goals in recent matches has been reliable. This time, Atlanta will strive for victory. The question is, can they continue their winning streak? Atlanta has been in excellent form lately, winning 6, drawing 2, and losing only 2 out of their last 10 matches. This impressive record can be attributed to the significant improvements in both their offensive and defensive capabilities.
      O/U
      ITA D1 Atalanta - Bologna
    More Recommend
    • VPS Vaasa has been in a rather lackluster offensive state. Their offensive efficiency is on the low side. The conversion rate of their offensive finishes stands at just 8.7% (1 out of 12 attempts), with an expected goals (xG) efficiency of 0.83. The success rate of their key passes is 67%, and the expected threat (xT) value in the front - field is only 0.12, indicating a lack of creativity in attack. In the midfield, they do have a relatively high control rate of 64%. However, the speed of their play conversion is sluggish, taking an average of 3.0 seconds. This means they fail to capitalize quickly on counter - attack opportunities, which is a significant drawback. Looking at the team's physical performance, the total high - intensity running distance is 11.8 km, and they only make 15 sprints. These figures are notably lower than the league average. This shows that they adopt a conservative game rhythm, which in turn suppresses the potential for high - scoring games. VPS has shown str
      O/U
      FIN D1 Vaasa VPS - Lahti
    • In this FNL encounter, let's take a close look at the offensive capabilities of both teams. Gnistan has an offensive conversion rate of 8.4% and an xG efficiency of 0.9. Meanwhile, TPS Turku shows a better offensive conversion rate of 10.2% and an xG efficiency of 1.1. However, both teams' offensive efficiencies are below the league average. When it comes to TPS Turku, they have a key - pass success rate of 65% and a front - field pass value of 0.8. They are good at controlling the game rhythm, but lack creativity. In the games they've won, TPS Turku's midfield has a ball - possession rate of 58%. Their conversion speed is slow, with an average ball advancement time of 4.2 seconds, which restricts fast counter - attacks. Also, their high - intensity sprints cover a distance of 12.4 km, lower than the league average of 13.8 km, indicating a relatively gentle game pace. TPS Turku has shown excellent performance on the defensive end. They made 18 tackles, with 70% of them in the midfield
      O/U
      FIN D1 Gnistan Helsinki - TPS Turku
    • Both Mariehamn and Järvenpää have shown a lack of offensive efficiency in the Veikkausliiga. Their offensive conversion rates stand at a meager 11% and 9% respectively, falling short of the league average of 15%. The xG efficiency values of 0.9 and 0.8 indicate a deficiency in the quality of goal - scoring opportunities. In the passing department, the success rate of key passes is 62%, and the passing value in the front - field area is relatively low. This has restricted effective breakthroughs. Mariehamn has a midfield ball - possession rate of 57%, but their transition speed is slow. The efficiency of their counter - attack advancement is only 40%, failing to connect attacks quickly. Both teams' high - intensity sprint distances are below the standard. Mariehamn has covered 85 km and Järvenpää 82 km, which shows a lack of running enthusiasm and a conservative tactical approach. Maryport has shown outstanding defensive stats. They made 18 tackles in the whole game, with 12 of th
      O/U
      FIN D1 IFK Mariehamn - Jaro
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.