Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
weeb in japan is like
205
Articles
0
Like
0
Follower
43.3%
Win Rate
-18.1%
ROI
30
Tips
1.94
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Dirty Dirty DiamondWon 5/5Follow81.3%Win Rate +52%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
Prince_MeshWon 17/20Follow80.8%Win Rate +53.7%ROI 26Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
WissywaxplanetWon 5/5Follow80.8%Win Rate +25.4%ROI 26Tips 1.57Avg Odds -
4
CFCDailyWon 8/9Follow80%Win Rate +43.2%ROI 11Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
Red_GuyWon 6/7Follow78.6%Win Rate +43.3%ROI 14Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
6
EvilSpiritFollow78.3%Win Rate +45.3%ROI 25Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Salvador González ValeroGernistan has been in good form recently, winning 3, drawing 1, and losing 1 in their last 5 games. They've managed to defeat strong teams like Helsinki, Elvis, and Turku International. Their offensive performance has been remarkable, with an average of 2.0 goals per game and 15.0 shots on goal. This shows their excellent ability to create scoring opportunities. On the other hand, TPS Turku's recent form is less impressive. They've won 1, drawn 2, and lost 2 in their last 5 matches. Their offensive output is relatively low, averaging only 1.4 goals per game and 12.0 shots. Clearly, they are weaker than Gernistan in terms of creating shooting opportunities. Gernika plays with a 3 - 4 - 2 - 1 formation. Their strategy focuses on having a strong midfield and making progress along the flanks. The overlapping runs of the wing - backs are their core attacking method. On the other hand, TPS Turku uses a 4 - 4 - 2 formation. They rely on their twin strikers to break through the defense. TheirO/U
FIN D1
Gnistan Helsinki
1-1 TPS Turku
-
Iqbal ahmadI've analyzed the performance of these two teams. In terms of offensive efficiency, Gnistan has a better end - conversion rate of 23%, compared to TPS's 17%. The xG values also indicate Gnistan's stronger offensive threat, with 1.8 against TPS's 1.2. TPS does have an edge in key passing success rate, standing at 68%. However, the value of their forward passes is only 0.3, and with a 58% ball - possession rate, their efficiency in central penetration is lacking. Gnistan shows great strength in midfield. They achieve 12 tackles per 90 minutes, and their transition speed of 1.2 seconds per play is faster than TPS's 1.4 seconds. Their running distance of 11.3 km per game is 1.2 km more than TPS, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 15% higher. On the defensive side, TPS has 14 clearances per game, but their interception success rate is only 54%, which means there are obvious loopholes in their defense. I'm part of a multi - person team. Every day, we carefully select and thoroughlAHFIN D1
Gnistan Helsinki
1-1 TPS Turku
-
u cant ansI've conducted in - depth research on this match. In this game, Gnistan has significant advantages over TPS Turku. In terms of offensive conversion, Gnistan's attacking end conversion rate is 12% higher than TPS, and its xG efficiency leads by 0.35. For TPS, its key passing success rate is only 48%, 15 percentage points behind Gnistan. The value of its forward - field passes is also 18% lower. In midfield control, Gnistan has an average of 12 interceptions per game. Its transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster than TPS, and the whole team runs 3.2 kilometers more. The number of high - intensity sprints of Gnistan leads by 27 times. On the defensive end, Gnistan has 18 tackles and 11 clearances, better than TPS's 14 tackles and 8 clearances. In the attacking end, Gnistan has a stronger ability to seize opportunities, with a shot - on - target rate 10% higher than TPS. According to xG data, Gnistan's expected goals are 1.8, while TPS only has 1.1. Overall, Gnistan shows a better performancAHFIN D1
Gnistan Helsinki
1-1 TPS Turku
FIN D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post