Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
ConstanceWon 5/5Follow86.4%Win Rate +26.2%ROI 22Tips 1.50Avg Odds -
2
SPORT249Won 10/10Follow85.7%Win Rate +33.4%ROI 14Tips 1.56Avg Odds -
3
collin_voraFollow84.6%Win Rate +47.1%ROI 13Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
WolfRMFCFollow80%Win Rate +44.3%ROI 10Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
4
88SOCCERWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 10Tips 1.71Avg Odds -
4
Obertan4lifeWon 7/8Follow80%Win Rate +26.1%ROI 10Tips 1.55Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Alyana CarterMoscow Dynamo holds a significant edge in their head - to - head encounters against Grozny Terek at home. In the last three home Russian Premier League games, they've had an unbeaten record of two wins and one draw. A 4 - 2 victory at home demonstrated their prowess. The 0 - 0 corner count in that match highlighted the home team's high - efficiency in converting set - pieces. Another 2 - 0 clean - sheet win was also remarkable, with a 7 - 3 corner statistic that showed the strength of their wing attacks. On the other hand, Grozny Terek shows great resilience on the road. In an away game, they managed a 2 - 1 win. The 7 - 8 corner count in that match indicated their efficiency in attack - defense transitions. When they played at home and drew 2 - 2, the 2 - 8 corner count revealed some vulnerabilities in their defensive end. Moscow Dynamo has a strong home - field advantage. Statistical data shows that in home games against Grozny Terek, Moscow Dynamo averages 2.67 goals per game. In coAH
RUS Cup
Dynamo Moscow
3-0 Terek Grozny
-
bensalem Won 4/6Both Moscow Dynamo and Grozny Terek have been struggling with their offensive efficiency, ranking among the lower tiers in the league. Moscow Dynamo has a conversion rate of only 9.3% in offensive finishes, placing 14th in the Russian Premier League. Meanwhile, Grozny Terek, despite having an expected goals (xG) of 1.12 per game, only manages an actual goal average of 0.8. In terms of passing, the key pass success rates of both teams are below 65%. Their passing value in the front - field (PTV) fails to reach 0.35. The weak control in the midfield results in a less - than - 20% proportion of counter - attacks. Regarding physical performance, Moscow Dynamo runs an average of 112 km per game but only has 19 high - intensity sprints. Grozny Terek makes only 14 sprints in every 1.4 km of running. This indicates that both teams tend to allocate more energy to the defensive end.O/URUS Cup
Dynamo Moscow
3-0 Terek Grozny
-
Nö Lie Män📵In the historical encounters between Dynamo Moscow and Terek Grozny, the tactical contrast is striking. Terek Grozny's consistent dominance in corner - kick statistics stands out as a key aspect. In the last five direct confrontations, Terek Grozny had the upper hand in corner kicks four times. Their performance shows their stability in wing attacks and set - piece creation. Their rapid breakthroughs often translate into corner - kick opportunities. On the other hand, Dynamo Moscow, despite winning 4 - 2 at home in a Russian Premier League match, had a 0 - 0 corner - kick record in that game. This indicates that their attacking strategy relies more on central breakthroughs, lacking effective wing cooperation. Overall, the corner - kick statistics from past meetings suggest that Terek Grozny has an edge in terms of creating set - piece opportunities through wing play, while Dynamo Moscow needs to work on improving its wing - based attacking tactics. In previous encounters, Grozny had shO/URUS Cup
Dynamo Moscow
3-0 Terek Grozny
RUS Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post