Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> amvn>

    KVSK Lommel VS Club Brugge

    Belgian Pro League
    Analysis More Tips
    KVSK Lommel
    KVSK Lommel 0
    1 Club Brugge
    Club Brugge
    I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record, offering a long - term high - quality product tailored for big players. In terms of offensive efficiency, Bruges significantly outperforms Lommel. Bruges has an offensive conversion rate of 18.3%, compared to Lommel's 12.1%. The xG efficiency values are 1.23 for Bruges and 0.79 for Lommel. Regarding the value of forward passes, Bruges reaches 14.7, while Lommel only has 9.2. The success rate of key passes for Bruges is 41%, much higher than Lommel's 28%. In midfield control, Bruges has an average ball - possession rate of 62% and a faster transition speed. They have 112 high - intensity sprints per game (Lommel has 89), and their running distance is 3.2 kilometers more than Lommel's. On the defensive end, Bruges has 15 tackles (Lommel 9) and 11 interceptions (Lommel 6), and also has an advantage in clearance statistics. The offensive conversion rate of Bruges is 23% (Lommel 15%), and the xG comparison is 2.14 for Bruges versus 1.03 for Lommel.
    Further Reading
    • Olayori.
      Olayori.
      Lommel, playing at home, has had a mediocre performance in the Belgian First Division this season. They're firmly in the middle of the league table, with no serious threat of relegation and little chance of challenging the top teams for the championship, so their ceiling in this season's competition seems limited. Recently, the team has shown a stable trend in the league. Their results alternate between wins and losses, rarely experiencing extreme streaks of consecutive defeats or victories, which indicates a certain level of consistency on the pitch. In terms of attack, Lommel adopts a pragmatic and conservative style. They don't aim for high - intensity ball - possession attacks. Instead, they mainly rely on home - ground positional play and quick counter - attacks to create scoring opportunities. However, their finishing efficiency in the front - court is just average, and their scoring methods are relatively one - dimensional. As a result, it's difficult for them to maintain a high
      AH
      BEL D1 KVSK Lommel 0-1 Club Brugge
    • Salvador González Valero
      Salvador González Valero
      The home team has been in excellent form recently, achieving 8 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss in their last ten matches across all competitions. They have managed to outperform their group rivals with a goal - difference advantage. In their last three encounters against the away team, they've won all the games, with an average goal difference of 2 per game. The home team maintains a stable ball - possession rate of over 58% and a passing success rate of 87%. They exert continuous pressure on the opponents through delicate midfield combinations. In attack, they rank among the top three with an average of 15.3 shots per game. Their 42% shot - on - target conversion rate shows the high accuracy of their strikers. Regarding physical fitness, the whole team runs an average of 112 kilometers per game. The number of high - intensity sprints (153 times per game) is 27% more than that of the opponents. This indicates their strong physical endurance, which could be a key factor in the upcoming match.
      AH
      BEL D1 KVSK Lommel 0-1 Club Brugge
    • ASENEKA MOSES
      ASENEKA MOSES
      Lommel has shown remarkable offensive and defensive efficiency at home this season. In a home game, they thrashed Westerlo 4-0, leading 2-0 at halftime and having an edge in corner kicks with a 5-4 count, which clearly demonstrated their efficient attacking capabilities. However, their away form has been rather inconsistent. They suffered a 0-1 defeat to Charleroi, with a huge disparity in corner kicks (2-12), highlighting their defensive vulnerabilities. In another away game, they drew 1-1 with Sint-Truiden, trailing 0-1 at halftime and being outnumbered in corner kicks 6-2. In recent friendly matches, Lommel won 2-1 against Eersel but suffered a heavy 0-4 loss to Den Haag, indicating that they still need to improve the consistency of their attack and defense. On the other hand, Club Brugge has been dominant at home. They narrowly defeated Gent 2-1, beat Cercle Brugge 1-0, and triumphed over Kortrijk 3-0. On average, they scored 2.0 goals and conceded 0.7 goals per game. Lommel's rece
      AH
      BEL D1 KVSK Lommel 0-1 Club Brugge
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.