Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
TopnotchWon 16/18Follow88.9%Win Rate +43.6%ROI 18Tips 1.60Avg Odds -
2
RossyGWon 17/20Follow85%Win Rate +36.2%ROI 20Tips 1.58Avg Odds -
3
ThatMadridGuyFollow83.3%Win Rate +48.7%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
JJ LauFollow83.3%Win Rate +36.3%ROI 12Tips 1.61Avg Odds -
5
Dirty Dirty DiamondWon 10/12Follow80%Win Rate +49.4%ROI 15Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
AI Soccer PredictorWon 7/8Follow76.5%Win Rate +46.1%ROI 22Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Aykut TırmıkçıManchester United's home form is crucial in this game. They'll deploy a 4-2-3-1 formation throughout. In attack, they rely on midfielders to hold the ball and orchestrate plays. Wingers will charge down the flanks to create goal - scoring opportunities, emphasizing quick transitions from defense to attack. At home, the team averages 5.5 key passes per game. Their counter - attacks are fast, and the strikers have a certain level of finishing ability in front of the goal. However, there are problems in their defense. The midfield's interception stability fluctuates. When facing the opponent's consecutive short - pass movements, they are easily drawn out. As a result, during continuous defensive pressure, the defense may have issues with positional errors in some areas. Manchester City adopts a 4-3-3 possession and pressing system on the road. They keep using short passes to disrupt the opponent's defense. Full-backs make forward runs to widen the offensive width, and the front players roAH
ENG PR
Manchester United
0-1 Manchester City
-
Adin ReportsManchester City's dominance in offensive efficiency is evident. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 24%, significantly higher than Manchester United's 18%. The xG efficiency value of City is 1.24, while United's is only 0.83. In terms of key passing, City's success rate is 92%, outperforming United's 85%. The value of forward passes, 0.82 for City and 0.57 for United, reflects the precision of their tactical execution. When it comes to midfield control, City holds a 62% possession rate and has 85 attack - defense transitions, compared to United's 48% and 63 times. The average time for City to launch a counter - attack is 5.3 seconds, quicker than United's 7.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total high - intensity running distance of City's team is 112 km, far more than United's 1.4 km. City also has 23 sprints, while United has 17. This shows that City has an edge in physical fitness. Overall, based on these data, City seems to have a strong upper hand in this encoAHENG PR
Manchester United
0-1 Manchester City
-
TamaroManchester United has had a somewhat inconsistent start to the season, with 1 win, 1 draw, and 1 loss in the first 3 rounds, accumulating 4 points and sitting in the middle of the league table. The team has shown some instability in tough matches, and the pressure to secure a better position in the standings is gradually mounting. At home, Manchester United has been unbeaten in 2 rounds, with 1 win and 1 draw. The enthusiastic home - crowd support seems to boost the players' running motivation and the intensity of physical confrontation. The team is in good shape in terms of injuries. Up front, Rasmus Højlund has a significant speed advantage, making him highly effective in counter - attacks. Marcus Rashford is excellent at cutting in from the wing and creating goal - scoring opportunities with long - range shots. In the midfield, Bruno Fernandes provides precise passes and is a real threat from set - pieces. At the back, Raphaël Varane is strong in the air and reliable in terms of pAHENG PR
Manchester United
0-1 Manchester City
ENG PR
More Recommend
-
In the historical encounters between Chicago Fire and Vancouver Whitecaps in the MLS, the corner - kick statistics reveal a distinct tactical contrast. In the last nine meetings, Chicago Fire has a poor record in corner - kicks when playing at home. For instance, in previous home matches, they lost 0 - 1, and the corner - kick difference was - 5; they drew 1 - 1 with a corner - kick difference of - 2; they won 4 - 0 but still had a corner - kick difference of - 5; and they lost 0 - 2 with a corner - kick difference of 0. This shows that Chicago Fire struggles to create corner - kick opportunities in their home games. On the other hand, Vancouver Whitecaps have an outstanding ability to generate corner - kicks when playing away. In an away game, they won 1 - 0, and the corner - kick difference was 5, highlighting their edge in corner - kicks on the road. When it comes to matches at Vancouver's home, they lost 1 - 3 with a corner - kick difference of - 6 and also lost 1 - 3 with a cornerO/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
-
Vancouver Whitecaps
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post