Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
ThatMadridGuyWon 9/9Follow100%Win Rate +62.6%ROI 10Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
2
Igodo oyounvieWon 5/5Follow86.7%Win Rate +26.9%ROI 15Tips 1.63Avg Odds -
3
1
IbroxoniaFollow85.7%Win Rate +64.2%ROI 14Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
4
Noah WillWon 10/11Follow84.6%Win Rate +35.1%ROI 13Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
5
2
YomiAICryptoWon 7/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +59.3%ROI 12Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
1
TopnotchWon 4/4Follow80%Win Rate +13.4%ROI 30Tips 1.47Avg Odds
1
2
1
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Kingofbet88 Won 5/8ADT Tarma host Cienciano in Peru’s Liga 1 Torneo Clausura on September 23. After nine Clausura matches, ADT have only two points and sit 17th, while Cienciano have seven points from eight games in 14th place. In the 2026 Apertura, Cienciano finished third with 33 points, while ADT were tenth with 20 points. Across the 2026 season, Cienciano have 40 points from 25 matches, compared with ADT’s 22 points from 26 games. ADT’s recent form is concerning. They lost 2-0 to Alianza Lima, 3-0 to Melgar, 3-1 to Sport Huancayo and 5-1 to Juan Pablo II, with a 1-1 draw against Alianza Atlético in between. Their defence has repeatedly been exposed. Cienciano have also been inconsistent. Their latest five included a 5-2 win over Cajamarca, defeats to Cusco and Sport Boys, a goalless draw with Garcilaso, and a 3-0 defeat to Montevideo City Torque. They were also eliminated from the Copa Sudamericana. The overall head-to-head record stands at 11 matches: three wins for each side and five draws.AH
PER L1
AD Tarma
-
Cienciano
PER L1More Recommend
-
Description This opening-round encounter brings together two fierce regional rivals looking to set an early tone in the tournament. Both sides carry proud histories in the competition and view this fixture as a vital stepping stone toward advancing from Group A. Analysis Iraq typically relies on a robust central midfield engine and direct attacking sequences through dynamic wingers, aiming to catch opponents on transitions. Oman counters with disciplined defensive shapes, well-organized blocks, and swift counter-attacks orchestrated through experienced wide midfielders. Oman enters with balanced momentum from their recent outings, while Iraq is eager to shift gears and reassert regional dominance following a testing run of fixtures. Encounters between these two nations are historically tight, physical affairs, and their most recent meeting saw Iraq edge out a hard-fought victory, adding extra motivation for Oman. Prediction Expect a cagey, tactical battle where both team1x2
GC
Iraq
-
Oman
-
Saudi Arabia Stats In the last games, Saudi Arabia has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 20%, while their draw rate stands at 30%. On the other hand, they lost 50% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 20% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 40% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, Saudi Arabia scores 1 goals per game and concedes 2 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 30% of the games, and the team scored in 50% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 10% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 40% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 10% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 10%, and losing with BTTS in 20%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 20% of the games, 1 goal in 10% of the games, 2 goals in 10% of the games, 3 goals in 40% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 20% of the games. Kuwait Stats In their recent games, Kuwait has demonstrated varied perfAHGC
Saudi Arabia
-
Kuwait
-
Chelsea (W) Stats In the last games, Chelsea (W) has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 80%, while their draw rate stands at 10%. On the other hand, they lost 10% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 60% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 10% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, Chelsea (W) scores 3 goals per game and concedes 1 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 40% of the games, and the team scored in 100% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 60% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 60% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 40% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 10%, and losing with BTTS in 10%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 0% of the games, 1 goal in 20% of the games, 2 goals in 20% of the games, 3 goals in 10% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 50% of the games. FK Austria Vienna (W) Stats In their recent games, FK Austria Vienna (W) hO/U
UEFA WUC
Chelsea FC (W)
-
Austria Wien (W)
GC
UEFA WUC
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post