Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
ConstanceWon 14/16Follow82.4%Win Rate +29.6%ROI 17Tips 1.60Avg Odds -
2
Koke ResurrecciónFollow81.8%Win Rate +45.6%ROI 13Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
3
peter habakkukFollow80%Win Rate +39.2%ROI 12Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
4
Funny MemesFollow80%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 11Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
5
1
Mick909Won 10/13Follow76.9%Win Rate +35%ROI 15Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
6
Stef Olivier KFollow76.9%Win Rate +38.6%ROI 14Tips 1.88Avg Odds
1
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Looking at the core performance metrics for this Africa Cup of Nations tie, South Africa holds a distinct advantage across nearly all key statistical dimensions.
Their offensive finishing conversion rate reaches 18.3%, well above Eritrea's 12.1%. Expected goals data records South Africa at 0.92 expected goals per match, while Eritrea only manages 0.51.
In terms of high-value progressive passes in the final third, South Africa completes 4.7 such passes per 90 minutes, nearly double Eritrea's 2.3. Their 62% possession rate, paired with a 3.1 times per minute transition speed, builds seamless linkup between their defensive and attacking lines. The side's total high-intensity running distance per game hits 112km, 15% more than their opponents' figure.
Defensively, South Africa averages 14.2 tackles and 8.7 interceptions per fixture, both better than Eritrea's corresponding stats. Their 16.8% conversion rate on clear scoring opportunities, compared to Eritrea's 9.4%, further demonstrates their far stronger final-third execution quality.
Further Reading
-
Arnola Septa MaheswaraI’ve been tracking the build-up to this Africa Cup of Nations clash, and Eritrea is facing a severe squad crisis right now. They grabbed a 1-1 away draw against Kenya on matchday 1, taking the lead through Girmay before conceding a last-gasp equaliser in the 87th minute, and eliminated Eswatini 4-1 on aggregate in the preliminary qualifying round. Only 3 out of 10 local players that featured in their Eswatini tie have returned to the squad, leaving head coach Yakan no choice but to rely heavily on diaspora players, with forward Ali Suleiman already bagging 3 goals in qualifying so far. South Africa opened their campaign with a 2-1 home win over Guinea, delivering a perfect winning start for Musimane’s second tenure as head coach, as his side notched 22 total shots with 5 on target across the full match. The team is dealing with multiple fitness concerns: Mboe has withdrawn from the training camp, Sibi missed the opening fixture, and Modiba remains a doubt with hamstring tightness.O/U
CAF NC
Eritrea
0-5 South Africa
-
u cant ansI am a seasoned football analyst with years of in-depth research on competitive fixtures, bringing you this carefully selected premium analysis. Eritrea has shown outstanding diversity and explosive strength in their attacking play, with 17 players in the current squad having scored goals so far. 10 of these players have netted 2 or more goals, and this multi-point scoring pattern fully reflects the team's abundant firepower reserve and all-round attacking capability. South Africa, by comparison, has performed terribly in the 12 matches this cycle where they fell behind after conceding first. They have not secured a single win in those games, and lost as many as 8 of them. This poor track record clearly exposes their prominent flaws: weak ability to adjust both offense and defense when facing adverse situations, and insufficient mental resilience under high pressure. Eritrea boasts an impressively diversified attacking setup in this Africa Cup of Nations campaign, with as many as 17 diAHCAF NC
Eritrea
0-5 South Africa
-
Iqbal ahmadOur long-running, data-backed analysis service has kept consistent, reliable performance for a long time, tailored for dedicated football fans and bettors seeking steady high-quality insights. Eritrea’s finishing conversion rate is only 18%, lower than South Africa’s 24%, and their expected goals (xG) efficiency registers at 0.74, compared to South Africa’s 1.12, which clearly demonstrates the obvious gap in attacking quality between the two sides. South Africa also posts a 68% success rate on key passes, far better than Eritrea’s 55%, with the value of their final-third passes 12% higher than their opponent. When it comes to midfield control, South Africa averages 11 tackles and 9 interceptions per fixture, with their counter-attack transition speed 20% higher. The whole squad averages 11.3km of running per player per game, and completes 42 high-intensity sprints in total, both metrics outperforming Eritrea’s 9.8km average running distance and 31 high-intensity sprints. SoutAHCAF NC
Eritrea
0-5 South Africa
CAF NC
